rs1143646
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001388492.1(HTT):c.3273T>G(p.Ile1091Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0483 in 1,613,944 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,183 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001388492.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Huntington diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- Lopes-Maciel-Rodan syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- juvenile Huntington diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTT | ENST00000355072.11 | c.3273T>G | p.Ile1091Met | missense_variant | Exon 25 of 67 | 1 | NM_001388492.1 | ENSP00000347184.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0366 AC: 5574AN: 152102Hom.: 157 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0401 AC: 9998AN: 249570 AF XY: 0.0427 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0495 AC: 72415AN: 1461724Hom.: 2025 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0501 AC XY: 36413AN XY: 727170 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0366 AC: 5574AN: 152220Hom.: 158 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0370 AC XY: 2750AN XY: 74420 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at