rs114626713

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.21019A>T​(p.Ile7007Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000814 in 1,613,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I7007T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
7
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.27

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008122355).
BP6
Variant 2-178724356-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178724356-T-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 46679.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00454 (691/152280) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0162 (673/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0152. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 291 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.21019A>T p.Ile7007Phe missense_variant Exon 72 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.21019A>T p.Ile7007Phe missense_variant Exon 72 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00451
AC:
687
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
274
AN:
248704
AF XY:
0.000771
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000266
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000426
AC:
622
AN:
1461324
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000352
AC XY:
256
AN XY:
726932
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0158
AC:
528
AN:
33446
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
20
AN:
44700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53390
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000450
AC:
5
AN:
1111632
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00106
AC:
64
AN:
60348
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
35
70
104
139
174
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00454
AC:
691
AN:
152280
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00391
AC XY:
291
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0162
AC:
673
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000589
AC:
9
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
37
74
110
147
184
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000291
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00500
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0168
AC:
64
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00144
AC:
174
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Apr 08, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ile5763Phe in exon 69 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.5% (48/3130) of African American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs114626713) -

Oct 17, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 05, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 16, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 01, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jun 12, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 12, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided Benign:1
Jun 21, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jun 12, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jun 12, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.74
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0081
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.087
T
PhyloP100
3.3
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.59
Sift
Uncertain
0.024
D;.;.;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;D;D
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.68
MPC
0.58
ClinPred
0.049
T
GERP RS
6.0
Mutation Taster
=43/57
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114626713; hg19: chr2-179589083; API