rs11466110
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002506.3(NGF):c.214G>A(p.Val72Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V72V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002506.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGF | NM_002506.3 | c.214G>A | p.Val72Met | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000369512.3 | NP_002497.2 | |
NGF | XM_011541518.3 | c.379G>A | p.Val127Met | missense_variant | 3/3 | XP_011539820.1 | ||
NGF | XM_006710663.4 | c.214G>A | p.Val72Met | missense_variant | 2/2 | XP_006710726.1 | ||
NGF-AS1 | NR_157569.1 | n.207+3342C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGF | ENST00000369512.3 | c.214G>A | p.Val72Met | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_002506.3 | ENSP00000358525.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00672 AC: 1023AN: 152210Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00153 AC: 384AN: 251166Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00100 AC XY: 136AN XY: 135804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000678 AC: 991AN: 1461876Hom.: 16 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000562 AC XY: 409AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00673 AC: 1025AN: 152328Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00650 AC XY: 484AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital sensory neuropathy with selective loss of small myelinated fibers Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 14, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 16, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 26, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
NGF-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 27, 2024 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at