rs11466111
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_002506.3(NGF):c.239G>A(p.Arg80Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0144 in 1,614,182 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 224 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R80W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002506.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGF | NM_002506.3 | c.239G>A | p.Arg80Gln | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000369512.3 | NP_002497.2 | |
NGF | XM_011541518.3 | c.404G>A | p.Arg135Gln | missense_variant | 3/3 | XP_011539820.1 | ||
NGF | XM_006710663.4 | c.239G>A | p.Arg80Gln | missense_variant | 2/2 | XP_006710726.1 | ||
NGF-AS1 | NR_157569.1 | n.207+3317C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGF | ENST00000369512.3 | c.239G>A | p.Arg80Gln | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_002506.3 | ENSP00000358525.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 1750AN: 152182Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0104 AC: 2609AN: 251144Hom.: 22 AF XY: 0.0108 AC XY: 1460AN XY: 135804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0147 AC: 21482AN: 1461882Hom.: 206 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0144 AC XY: 10442AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0115 AC: 1751AN: 152300Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0109 AC XY: 815AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital sensory neuropathy with selective loss of small myelinated fibers Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 26, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jan 28, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
NGF-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 18, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at