rs114771537

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000053.4(ATP7B):c.3891C>T(p.Val1297Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

ATP7B
NM_000053.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.48

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATP7B (HGNC:870): (ATPase copper transporting beta) This gene is a member of the P-type cation transport ATPase family and encodes a protein with several membrane-spanning domains, an ATPase consensus sequence, a hinge domain, a phosphorylation site, and at least 2 putative copper-binding sites. This protein is a monomer, and functions as a copper-transporting ATPase which exports copper out of the cells, such as the efflux of hepatic copper into the bile. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms with distinct cellular localizations, have been characterized. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Wilson disease which is characterized by copper accumulation. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2019]

ATP7B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP6

Variant 13-51937488-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-51937488-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 157954.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-51937488-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.48 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00983 (1497/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0341 (1419/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0327. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 697 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATP7B	NM_000053.4 link	c.3891C>T	p.Val1297Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 21	ENST00000242839.10	NP_000044.2	P35670-1B7ZLR4A0A024RDX3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATP7B	ENST00000242839.10 link	c.3891C>T	p.Val1297Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 21	1	NM_000053.4	ENSP00000242839.5		P35670-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00980

AC:

1492

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0341

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00574

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00257

AC:

640

AN:

249408

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00184

AC XY:

249

AN XY:

135328

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0362

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000222

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000618

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000825

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00108

AC:

1574

AN:

1461722

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000923

AC XY:

671

AN XY:

727158

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0369

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000302

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000639

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00270

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00983

AC:

1497

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00936

AC XY:

697

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0341

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00568

Alfa

AF:

0.00517

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0113

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Wilson disease

Benign:6

Aug 05, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

May 23, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 12, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The ATP7B c.3891C>T (p.Val1297Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict the strenghtening of a canonical splice acceptor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 348/120764 control chromosomes (3 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.032967 (324/9828). This frequency is about 6 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATP7B variant (0.0054006), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likley benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, due to the synonymous nature of the variant, the lack of predicted detrimental effect on splicing, and the relatively high frequency in the population, this variant is classified as benign. -

ATP7B-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 01, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

0.13

DANN

Benign

0.68

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over