rs114829239
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001040108.2(MLH3):āc.8A>Gā(p.Lys3Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00166 in 1,613,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0084 ( 23 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.00095 ( 19 hom. )
Consequence
MLH3
NM_001040108.2 missense
NM_001040108.2 missense
Scores
3
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.42
Genes affected
MLH3 (HGNC:7128): (mutL homolog 3) This gene is a member of the MutL-homolog (MLH) family of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MLH genes are implicated in maintaining genomic integrity during DNA replication and after meiotic recombination. The protein encoded by this gene functions as a heterodimer with other family members. Somatic mutations in this gene frequently occur in tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability, and germline mutations have been linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer type 7 (HNPCC7). Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified, but the full-length nature of only two transcript variants has been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 14-75049648-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-75049648-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 238254.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00842 (1283/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0283 (1178/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.027. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 598 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1283 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH3 | NM_001040108.2 | c.8A>G | p.Lys3Arg | missense_variant | 2/13 | ENST00000355774.7 | NP_001035197.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH3 | ENST00000355774.7 | c.8A>G | p.Lys3Arg | missense_variant | 2/13 | 5 | NM_001040108.2 | ENSP00000348020 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00842 AC: 1282AN: 152200Hom.: 23 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1282
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00228 AC: 571AN: 250216Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00171 AC XY: 232AN XY: 135382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
571
AN:
250216
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
232
AN XY:
135382
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000952 AC: 1392AN: 1461640Hom.: 19 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000811 AC XY: 590AN XY: 727100
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1392
AN:
1461640
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
590
AN XY:
727100
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00842 AC: 1283AN: 152318Hom.: 23 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00803 AC XY: 598AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1283
AN:
152318
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
598
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
132
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
330
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 30, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 7 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T;.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N;.;N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;.;.
Polyphen
B;B;.;B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
Position offset: 0
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at