rs114833839

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_203447.4(DOCK8):c.528+7C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000447 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DOCK8
NM_203447.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0001547

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.46

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DOCK8 (HGNC:19191): (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) This gene encodes a member of the DOCK180 family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors interact with Rho GTPases and are components of intracellular signaling networks. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

DOCK8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

DOCK8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).

BP6

Variant 9-304711-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-304711-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 377794.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00229 (349/152308) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00731 (304/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00664. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 165 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DOCK8	NM_203447.4 link	c.528+7C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 5 of 47	ENST00000432829.7	NP_982272.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DOCK8	ENST00000432829.7 link	c.528+7C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 5 of 47	1	NM_203447.4	ENSP00000394888.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00231

AC:

351

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00738

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00236

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00336

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000537

AC:

135

AN:

251452

AF XY:

0.000427

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00646

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000752

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000254

AC:

372

AN:

1461818

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000224

AC XY:

163

AN XY:

727218

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00741

AC:

248

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000693

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000540

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000464

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.473

Heterozygous variant carriers

109

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00229

AC:

349

AN:

152308

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00222

AC XY:

165

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00731

AC:

304

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00235

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00332

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000639

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00248

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Oct 06, 2022

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 25, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.89

PhyloP100

1.5

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00015

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0080

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over