rs114868912
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001308093.3(GATA4):c.1141G>A(p.Val381Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00335 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 88 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001308093.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- atrial septal defect 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- structural congenital heart disease, multiple types - GATA4Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- testicular anomalies with or without congenital heart diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- metabolic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- pancreatic hypoplasia-diabetes-congenital heart disease syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- permanent neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- transient neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial atrial fibrillationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- tetralogy of fallotInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0109 AC: 1662AN: 152228Hom.: 31 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00521 AC: 1308AN: 251068 AF XY: 0.00551 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00257 AC: 3750AN: 1461688Hom.: 57 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00293 AC XY: 2131AN XY: 727136 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0109 AC: 1662AN: 152346Hom.: 31 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0114 AC XY: 849AN XY: 74498 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31513339, 28511407, 26997702, 30766556, 31115957, 26490186, 19678963, 28843068, 18055909, 17352393, 28372585, 16604480, 20981092, 21631294, 22995991, 22011241, 28161810, 21276881) -
- -
- -
- -
GATA4: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Neonatal insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Benign:1
Potent mutations in GATA4 gene are associated with neonatal diabetes, decreased insulin production due to pancreatic aplasia or hypoplasia. Also associated with isolated cardiac abnormalities in children, like atrial septal defects. However no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs114868912 yet. -
Atrioventricular septal defect 4 Benign:1
- -
GATA4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at