rs115004914
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.2253C>A(p.Asn751Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00708 in 1,612,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 132 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | NM_001369.3 | c.2253C>A | p.Asn751Lys | missense_variant | 15/79 | ENST00000265104.5 | NP_001360.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.2253C>A | p.Asn751Lys | missense_variant | 15/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104.4 | ||
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.2208C>A | p.Asn736Lys | missense_variant | 15/79 | ENSP00000505288.1 | ||||
ENSG00000251423 | ENST00000503244.2 | n.3088G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 4 | |||||
ENSG00000251423 | ENST00000637153.1 | n.3048G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00520 AC: 792AN: 152178Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00972 AC: 2439AN: 250898Hom.: 42 AF XY: 0.0113 AC XY: 1534AN XY: 135646
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00728 AC: 10631AN: 1460308Hom.: 130 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00847 AC XY: 6155AN XY: 726610
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00517 AC: 787AN: 152296Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00575 AC XY: 428AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 27, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31213628) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | DNAH5: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 23, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 03, 2016 | p.Asn751Lys in exon 15 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 3.8% (635/16496) of South Asian ch romosomes, including 18 homozygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs115004914). - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 09, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at