rs115035120
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_005045.4(RELN):c.10093G>A(p.Val3365Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000613 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005045.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | NM_005045.4 | c.10093G>A | p.Val3365Ile | missense_variant | 62/65 | ENST00000428762.6 | NP_005036.2 | |
SLC26A5-AS1 | NR_110141.1 | n.1366-20663C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | |||||
RELN | NM_173054.3 | c.10093G>A | p.Val3365Ile | missense_variant | 62/64 | NP_774959.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | ENST00000428762.6 | c.10093G>A | p.Val3365Ile | missense_variant | 62/65 | 5 | NM_005045.4 | ENSP00000392423 | P5 | |
SLC26A5-AS1 | ENST00000422488.1 | n.1366-20663C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000848 AC: 213AN: 251132Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 148AN XY: 135716
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000640 AC: 936AN: 1461798Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000806 AC XY: 586AN XY: 727206
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 16, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 08, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 23, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | RELN: BP4, BS2 - |
Childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | case-control | Bioinformatics Core, Luxembourg Center for Systems Biomedicine | Jan 01, 2017 | CAADphred>15 - |
Familial temporal lobe epilepsy 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Mar 22, 2019 | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome;C4225327:Familial temporal lobe epilepsy 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 27, 2023 | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at