rs115042730

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_014425.5(INVS):c.1945G>A(p.Val649Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000138 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00082 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

INVS
NM_014425.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0600

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

INVS (HGNC:17870): (inversin) This gene encodes a protein containing multiple ankyrin domains and two IQ calmodulin-binding domains. The encoded protein may function in renal tubular development and function, and in left-right axis determination. This protein interacts with nephrocystin and infers a connection between primary cilia function and left-right axis determination. A similar protein in mice interacts with calmodulin. Mutations in this gene have been associated with nephronophthisis type 2. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

INVS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nephronophthisis 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

INVS links:

LOC124902235 (HGNC:):

LOC124902235 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0054703653).

BP6

Variant 9-100284480-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-100284480-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 220405.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00082 (125/152356) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00277 (115/41590). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00235. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 67 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
INVS	NM_014425.5 link	c.1945G>A	p.Val649Met	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 17	ENST00000262457.7	NP_055240.2	Q9Y283-1A0A024R153

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
INVS	ENST00000262457.7 link	c.1945G>A	p.Val649Met	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 17	1	NM_014425.5	ENSP00000262457.2		Q9Y283-1
INVS	ENST00000262456.6 link	c.1945G>A	p.Val649Met	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 18	5		ENSP00000262456.2		Q9Y283-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000775

AC:

118

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00260

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

250406

AF XY:

0.000125

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00223

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000664

AC:

AN:

1461786

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000468

AC XY:

AN XY:

727200

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00230

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000895

AC:

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53400

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1111982

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000820

AC:

125

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000899

AC XY:

AN XY:

74506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00277

AC:

115

AN:

41590

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000588

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000483

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000827

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00295

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000231

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Oct 09, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Infantile nephronophthisis

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

INVS-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Jan 17, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.073

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.66

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

0.88

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.94

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.21

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.0

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.012

LIST_S2

Benign

0.40

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0076

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0055

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

N;N

PhyloP100

-0.060

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.41

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.024

Sift

Benign

0.086

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.068

T;D

Polyphen

0.70

P;P

Vest4

0.075

MVP

0.24

MPC

0.23

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

-3.2

Varity_R

0.026

gMVP

0.056

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over