rs115075057

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):ā€‹c.12923A>Gā€‹(p.Tyr4308Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00119 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0066 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00062 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008447111).
BP6
Variant 5-13714607-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13714607-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 238961.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00663 (1010/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0226 (941/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0214. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 478 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.12923A>G p.Tyr4308Cys missense_variant 75/79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.12923A>G p.Tyr4308Cys missense_variant 75/791 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104 P4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.12878A>G p.Tyr4293Cys missense_variant 75/79 ENSP00000505288 A1
DNAH5ENST00000683611.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.256A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00658
AC:
1001
AN:
152158
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00165
AC:
414
AN:
251106
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00126
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
135706
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000969
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000621
AC:
908
AN:
1461728
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000547
AC XY:
398
AN XY:
727168
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00119
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00663
AC:
1010
AN:
152276
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00642
AC XY:
478
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00757
Alfa
AF:
0.00159
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00719
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0191
AC:
84
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00201
AC:
244
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 13, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.64
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.59
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0084
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N
REVEL
Benign
0.070
Sift
Benign
0.068
T
Polyphen
0.0030
B
Vest4
0.37
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.51
ClinPred
0.029
T
GERP RS
1.5
Varity_R
0.35
gMVP
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115075057; hg19: chr5-13714716; COSMIC: COSV99035433; API