rs115109673
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.6703T>G(p.Leu2235Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00164 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L2235F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | NM_001369.3 | c.6703T>G | p.Leu2235Val | missense_variant | 41/79 | ENST00000265104.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.6703T>G | p.Leu2235Val | missense_variant | 41/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | P4 | |
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.6658T>G | p.Leu2220Val | missense_variant | 41/79 | A1 | |||
DNAH5 | ENST00000683090.1 | n.1634T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00873 AC: 1329AN: 152172Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00224 AC: 562AN: 251336Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00152 AC XY: 206AN XY: 135848
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000898 AC: 1312AN: 1461756Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000741 AC XY: 539AN XY: 727184
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00878 AC: 1337AN: 152290Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00878 AC XY: 654AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 06, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 30, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Leu2235Val in exon 41 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 3.0% (132/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs115109673). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 15, 2022 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 28, 2017 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at