rs115155428

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):​c.1075-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00822 in 1,613,656 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 5 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0084 ( 64 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002324
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.771

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ACVR2B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 3-38482193-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38482193-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136290.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 976 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ACVR2BNM_001106.4 linkc.1075-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 10 ENST00000352511.5 NP_001097.2 Q13705-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ACVR2BENST00000352511.5 linkc.1075-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 8 of 10 1 NM_001106.4 ENSP00000340361.3 Q13705-1
ACVR2BENST00000461232.1 linkn.4864-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 7 of 9 1
ACVR2BENST00000465020.5 linkn.1161-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 7 of 9 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00643
AC:
976
AN:
151678
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00220
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00840
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00670
AC:
1685
AN:
251410
AF XY:
0.00668
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00863
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0103
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00840
AC:
12284
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
64
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00842
AC XY:
6121
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00206
AC:
69
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00809
AC:
362
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00784
AC:
205
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
123
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00172
AC:
92
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
66
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00980
AC:
10895
AN:
1111994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00782
AC:
472
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.465
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
727
1454
2181
2908
3635
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
390
780
1170
1560
1950
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00643
AC:
976
AN:
151796
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00603
AC XY:
447
AN XY:
74182
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00186
AC:
77
AN:
41342
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00839
AC:
128
AN:
15252
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00605
AC:
21
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
5
AN:
4774
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00133
AC:
14
AN:
10544
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0103
AC:
698
AN:
67936
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
24
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
47
94
142
189
236
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00799
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00685
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0103
EpiControl
AF:
0.0122

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal Benign:4
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Sep 24, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ACVR2B: BP4, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.28
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-0.77
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000023
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115155428; hg19: chr3-38523684; API