rs115198029

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_006371.5(CRTAP):c.1039C>T(p.Leu347Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00306 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

CRTAP
NM_006371.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.80

Publications

8 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRTAP (HGNC:2379): (cartilage associated protein) The protein encoded by this gene is similar to the chicken and mouse CRTAP genes. The encoded protein is a scaffolding protein that may influence the activity of at least one member of the cytohesin/ARNO family in response to specific cellular stimuli. Defects in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta, a connective tissue disorder characterized by bone fragility and low bone mass. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRTAP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

osteogenesis imperfecta type 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CRTAP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022593439).

BP6

Variant 3-33132671-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-33132671-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 439559.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00247 (376/152312) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00497 (76/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00407. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 154 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRTAP	NM_006371.5 link	c.1039C>T	p.Leu347Phe	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 7	ENST00000320954.11	NP_006362.1	O75718
CRTAP	NM_001393363.1 link	c.1039C>T	p.Leu347Phe	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 6		NP_001380292.1
CRTAP	NM_001393364.1 link	c.910C>T	p.Leu304Phe	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 6		NP_001380293.1
CRTAP	NM_001393365.1 link	c.889C>T	p.Leu297Phe	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 6		NP_001380294.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRTAP	ENST00000320954.11 link	c.1039C>T	p.Leu347Phe	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 7	1	NM_006371.5	ENSP00000323696.5	O75718
CRTAP	ENST00000449224.1 link	c.910C>T	p.Leu304Phe	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 6	2		ENSP00000409997.1	C9JP16
CRTAP	ENST00000485310.1 link	n.*71C>T		downstream_gene_variant		4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00247

AC:

376

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00497

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00260

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00367

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00382

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00201

AC:

506

AN:

251494

AF XY:

0.00200

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00364

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000416

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00285

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00277

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00312

AC:

4557

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00303

AC XY:

2207

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000448

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00396

AC:

177

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00203

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000374

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5750

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00371

AC:

4123

AN:

1111962

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00275

AC:

166

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.494

Heterozygous variant carriers

236

472

709

945

1181

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

164

328

492

656

820

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00247

AC:

376

AN:

152312

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00207

AC XY:

154

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000722

AC:

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00497

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000282

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00367

AC:

250

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00378

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00196

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00227

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00485

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00415

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00384

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00180

AC:

219

EpiCase

AF:

0.00354

EpiControl

AF:

0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:1

May 25, 2023

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1 -

Apr 04, 2025

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Reported in an individual with osteogenesis imperfecta who also has a pathogenic variant in the COL1A1 gene (PMID: 32169308); Identified in a patient with osteoporosis and relatives with osteopenia or osteoporosis (PMID: 35313637); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32169308, 35313637, 30389107, 33469725) -

Jun 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CRTAP: BP4 -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 7

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The CRTAP c.1039C>T; p.Leu347Phe variant (rs115198029), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature; however, this variant is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 439559). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.20% (562/282,886 alleles, including a single homozygote) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The leucine at codon 347 is highly conserved, but computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.354). Based on the available information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:1

Feb 18, 2022

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 20, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CRTAP-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 29, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.64

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.14

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.030

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.58

D;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.63

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.59

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.86

D;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.023

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.63

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.8

M;.

PhyloP100

7.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.41

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.35

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D

Vest4

0.74

MVP

0.79

MPC

0.57

ClinPred

0.030

GERP RS

5.5

Varity_R

0.59

gMVP

0.50

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over