rs115283528
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000263735.9(EPCAM):āc.831A>Gā(p.Ile277Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00165 in 1,613,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I277V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000263735.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPCAM | NM_002354.3 | c.831A>G | p.Ile277Met | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000263735.9 | NP_002345.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPCAM | ENST00000263735.9 | c.831A>G | p.Ile277Met | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_002354.3 | ENSP00000263735 | P1 | |
EPCAM | ENST00000405271.5 | c.915A>G | p.Ile305Met | missense_variant | 8/10 | 5 | ENSP00000385476 | |||
EPCAM | ENST00000490733.1 | n.680A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 3 | |||||
EPCAM | ENST00000456133.5 | c.915A>G | p.Ile305Met | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/11 | 5 | ENSP00000410675 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00147 AC: 223AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00217 AC: 543AN: 249802Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00230 AC XY: 311AN XY: 135100
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00167 AC: 2439AN: 1461254Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00177 AC XY: 1289AN XY: 726894
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00157 AC XY: 117AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | EPCAM: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | May 03, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 20, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 26, 2021 | - - |
EPCAM-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 10, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 30, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at