rs115283528
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_002354.3(EPCAM):c.831A>G(p.Ile277Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00165 in 1,613,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I277V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002354.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPCAM | NM_002354.3 | c.831A>G | p.Ile277Met | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000263735.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPCAM | ENST00000263735.9 | c.831A>G | p.Ile277Met | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_002354.3 | P1 | |
EPCAM | ENST00000405271.5 | c.915A>G | p.Ile305Met | missense_variant | 8/10 | 5 | |||
EPCAM | ENST00000490733.1 | n.680A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 3 | ||||
EPCAM | ENST00000456133.5 | c.915A>G | p.Ile305Met | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/11 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00147 AC: 223AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00217 AC: 543AN: 249802Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00230 AC XY: 311AN XY: 135100
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00167 AC: 2439AN: 1461254Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00177 AC XY: 1289AN XY: 726894
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00157 AC XY: 117AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | May 03, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 20, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | EPCAM: BP4 - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 26, 2021 | - - |
EPCAM-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 10, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 30, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at