rs115408226

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM5BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2026G>A(p.Asp676Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000198 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D676E) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr16-68823490-C-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.24885863).

BP6

Variant 16-68823488-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68823488-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 182402.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=7}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 30 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
CDH1	NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.2026G>A	p.Asp676Asn	missense_variant	13/16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1843G>A	p.Asp615Asn	missense_variant	12/15		NP_001304113.1
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.478G>A	p.Asp160Asn	missense_variant	13/16		NP_001304114.1
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.61G>A	p.Asp21Asn	missense_variant	12/15		NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.2026G>A	p.Asp676Asn	missense_variant	13/16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769	P1	P12830-1
	ENST00000563916.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.39C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/3	4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152114

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251480

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000147

AC XY:

AN XY:

135916

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000205

AC:

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000234

AC XY:

AN XY:

727220

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000261

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000579

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto	Aug 01, 2022	Not applicable criteria (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Mar 06, 2023	This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Dec 05, 2017	- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Oct 16, 2020	Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as a pathogenic or benign germline variant to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29156750) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jul 31, 2018	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Nov 15, 2021	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	May 05, 2023	This missense variant replaces aspartic acid with asparagine at codon 676 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer in the literature (PMID: 25186627). This variant has been identified in 6/282868 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Baylor Genetics

Jan 15, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.14

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.30

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.26

T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.51

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.52

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Benign

0.72

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.023

MetaRNN

Benign

0.25

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.36

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.8

M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.58

D;D

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.073

T;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.60

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.75

P;.;.

Vest4

0.36

MutPred

0.45

Gain of methylation at K675 (P = 0.0874);.;.;

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.57

ClinPred

0.65

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.16

gMVP

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over