Menu
GeneBe

rs115414895

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.90G>A(p.Ala30=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00201 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 65 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A30A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 31 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 34 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51C
NM_058216.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 17-58692733-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58692733-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 140913.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-58692733-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.36 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0111 (1695/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.039 (1621/41594). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0374. There are 31 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 783 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 31 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD51CNM_058216.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.90G>A p.Ala30= synonymous_variant 1/9 ENST00000337432.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD51CENST00000337432.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.90G>A p.Ala30= synonymous_variant 1/91 NM_058216.3 P2O43502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0111
AC:
1689
AN:
152222
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0389
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00573
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00272
AC:
683
AN:
251462
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00187
AC XY:
254
AN XY:
135910
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0393
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
1548
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000875
AC XY:
636
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0389
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000288
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0111
AC:
1695
AN:
152340
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0105
AC XY:
783
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00567
Alfa
AF:
0.00489
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0123
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 03, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The RAD51C p.Ala30= variant was identified in the literature, however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided and the variant is listed as a polymorphism (Rodriguez-Lopez 2004). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs115414895) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (6x benign, 2x likely benign), and Clinvitae. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in control databases in 1015 of 277216 chromosomes (16 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 967 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), Other in 6 of 6468 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 34 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 5 of 126716 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 3 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Ala30= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 04, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 25, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 10, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 20, 2015- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group O Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 25, 2016- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 05, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 25, 2016- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 09, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMay 04, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.90
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115414895; hg19: chr17-56770094; COSMIC: COSV104591919; COSMIC: COSV104591919; API