rs115418995

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.371G>A (p.Arg124His) missense variant has a frequency of 0.02010% in Africans (5/24870 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort. This variant has been observed in ≥10 (31) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000637819.6, SCV000184938.6). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA294161/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:10B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0740

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.371G>A	p.Arg124His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.371G>A	p.Arg124His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.-1245G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-1449G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.371G>A	p.Arg124His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152104

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

250586

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000295

AC XY:

AN XY:

135496

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000885

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000137

AC:

AN:

1461182

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

726944

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000720

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000963

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000329

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:4

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:5

Nov 20, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 124 of the CDH1 protein (p.Arg124His). This variant is present in population databases (rs115418995, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with CDH1-related conditions (PMID: 24493355, 28873162, 36436516). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141538). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The histidine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jul 02, 2018

Mendelics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Feb 09, 2018

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PS4_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -

not provided

Uncertain:3

Dec 24, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 28, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28873162, 15235021, 36436516, 24493355, 36243179) -

Mar 09, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 16, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 14, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder

Uncertain:1

May 09, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.371G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg124His. This variant was reported in an individual with diffuse gastric cancer (Molinaro et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24493355). This variant is reported in 0.020% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-68835780-G-A), and is listed in ClinVar with confliciting interpretations of uncertain, likely benign and benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/141538/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 p.Arg124His variant was identified in 1 of 64 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.016) from individuals or families with diffuse gastric cancer (Molinaro 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs115418995) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and classified as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Invitae, Counsyl, and one other clinical laboratory), and in Zhejiang University Database (1x). The variant was not identified in Cosmic or MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 6 of 276422 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 4 of 24004 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 1 of 126036 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), and East Asian in 1 of 18866 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Arg124 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, single-nucleotide primer extension and RT-PCR assays did not detect allelic imbalance or aberrant splicing (Molinaro 2014). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jan 01, 2022

Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2023

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The c.371G>A (p.Arg124His) missense variant has a frequency of 0.02010% in Africans (5/24870 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort. This variant has been observed in at least 10 (31) individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000637819.6, SCV000184938.6). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as of likely benign based the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.058

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.42

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

1.5

DANN

Benign

0.81

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.25

T;T;T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.00045

LIST_S2

Benign

0.65

T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.68

MetaRNN

Benign

0.29

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.27

N;.;.;.;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.19

PROVEAN

Benign

0.77

N;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.65

Sift

Benign

0.42

T;.;.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.26

MVP

0.58

MPC

0.31

ClinPred

0.012

GERP RS

-0.54

Varity_R

0.012

gMVP

0.15

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over