rs11542682
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_194454.3(KRIT1):c.1980A>G(p.Val660=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.102 in 1,612,268 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,372 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1131 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.10 ( 9241 hom. )
Consequence
KRIT1
NM_194454.3 synonymous
NM_194454.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0620
Genes affected
KRIT1 (HGNC:1573): (KRIT1 ankyrin repeat containing) This gene encodes a protein containing four ankyrin repeats, a band 4.1/ezrin/radixin/moesin (FERM) domain, and multiple NPXY sequences. The encoded protein is localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm. It binds to integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein-1 alpha (ICAP1alpha), and plays a critical role in beta1-integrin-mediated cell proliferation. It associates with junction proteins and RAS-related protein 1A (Rap1A), which requires the encoded protein for maintaining the integrity of endothelial junctions. It is also a microtubule-associated protein and may play a role in microtubule targeting. Mutations in this gene result in cerebral cavernous malformations. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
?
Variant 7-92213240-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-92213240-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 263098.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-92213240-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.062 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.342 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRIT1 | NM_194454.3 | c.1980A>G | p.Val660= | synonymous_variant | 17/19 | ENST00000394505.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRIT1 | ENST00000394505.7 | c.1980A>G | p.Val660= | synonymous_variant | 17/19 | 1 | NM_194454.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.114 AC: 17294AN: 152010Hom.: 1128 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
17294
AN:
152010
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.127 AC: 31785AN: 250970Hom.: 2733 AF XY: 0.127 AC XY: 17262AN XY: 135620
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
31785
AN:
250970
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17262
AN XY:
135620
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.101 AC: 146928AN: 1460140Hom.: 9241 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.103 AC XY: 74705AN XY: 726432
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
146928
AN:
1460140
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
74705
AN XY:
726432
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.114 AC: 17304AN: 152128Hom.: 1131 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.117 AC XY: 8682AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
17304
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8682
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
734
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23485406, 20419355) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 24, 2017 | - - |
Cerebral cavernous malformation Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Mar 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum with arteriovenous fistulas Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at