rs11547464

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_002386.4(MC1R):​c.425G>A​(p.Arg142His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00629 in 1,606,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R142C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0047 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0065 ( 47 hom. )

Consequence

MC1R
NM_002386.4 missense

Scores

12
3
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.07

Publications

187 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MC1R (HGNC:6929): (melanocortin 1 receptor) This intronless gene encodes the receptor protein for melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH). The encoded protein, a seven pass transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, controls melanogenesis. Two types of melanin exist: red pheomelanin and black eumelanin. Gene mutations that lead to a loss in function are associated with increased pheomelanin production, which leads to lighter skin and hair color. Eumelanin is photoprotective but pheomelanin may contribute to UV-induced skin damage by generating free radicals upon UV radiation. Binding of MSH to its receptor activates the receptor and stimulates eumelanin synthesis. This receptor is a major determining factor in sun sensitivity and is a genetic risk factor for melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. Over 30 variant alleles have been identified which correlate with skin and hair color, providing evidence that this gene is an important component in determining normal human pigment variation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 10: BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when AlphaMissense, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015277147).
BP6
Variant 16-89919683-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-89919683-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 239153.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 716 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002386.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MC1R
NM_002386.4
MANE Select
c.425G>Ap.Arg142His
missense
Exon 1 of 1NP_002377.4

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MC1R
ENST00000555147.2
TSL:6 MANE Select
c.425G>Ap.Arg142His
missense
Exon 1 of 1ENSP00000451605.1
ENSG00000198211
ENST00000556922.1
TSL:2
c.425G>Ap.Arg142His
missense
Exon 1 of 5ENSP00000451560.1
MC1R
ENST00000555427.1
TSL:5
c.425G>Ap.Arg142His
missense
Exon 3 of 4ENSP00000451760.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00471
AC:
717
AN:
152210
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00140
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00667
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00688
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00812
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00532
AC:
1298
AN:
243850
AF XY:
0.00523
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000937
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00681
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00697
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00646
AC:
9385
AN:
1453752
Hom.:
47
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00629
AC XY:
4551
AN XY:
723480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000926
AC:
31
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00675
AC:
302
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
462
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000243
AC:
21
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
59
AN:
46008
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0132
AC:
76
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00721
AC:
8019
AN:
1111444
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00687
AC:
414
AN:
60304
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
615
1231
1846
2462
3077
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
306
612
918
1224
1530
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00470
AC:
716
AN:
152328
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00432
AC XY:
322
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
58
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00666
AC:
102
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0181
AC:
63
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000376
AC:
4
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00687
AC:
467
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00803
AC:
17
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
37
74
112
149
186
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00668
Hom.:
13
Bravo
AF:
0.00560
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00674
AC:
25
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00675
AC:
26
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000682
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00744
AC:
64
ExAC
AF:
0.00495
AC:
601
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00867
EpiControl
AF:
0.00960

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MC1R: PP3, BS2

Oct 26, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MC1R p.Arg142His variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11547464) as "With Likely benign allele" and in ClinVar (classified as benign and likely benign by Invitae and Illumina, respectively; associated conditions are Cutaneous malignant melanoma 5 and Malignant Melanoma Susceptibility). The variant was not identified in Cosmic. The variant was also found in control databases in 1414 of 275224 chromosomes (7 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005138 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 172 of 10318 chromosomes (freq: 0.01667), Other in 72 of 7130 chromosomes (freq: 0.0101), European (non-Finnish) in 874 of 127818 chromosomes (freq: 0.006838), Latino in 239 of 35340 chromosomes (freq: 0.006763), European (Finnish) in 27 of 19814 chromosomes (freq: 0.001363), African in 24 of 24718 chromosomes (freq: 0.000971), South Asian in 5 of 30578 chromosomes (freq: 0.000164), and East Asian in 1 of 19508 chromosomes (freq: 0.000051). The p.R142H variant is classified as a strong-R allele for the Red Hair Colour (RHC) phenotype (Morgan_2018_PMID: 30531825; Williams_2011_PMID: 21128237). The literature is inconsistent with regards to the p.R142H variant’s association with cutaneous melanoma (Williams_2011_PMID: 21128237; Artomov_2017_PMID: 29522175; Raimondi_2008_PMID: 18366057). One in vitro study showed the p.R142H variant has conserved binding properties but strongly impaired coupling to the cAMP generation system leading to red hair colour (Schioth_1999_PMID: 10403794). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Arg142 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Uncertain:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.32
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.22
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.54
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.70
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.87
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.76
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.60
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.91
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
4.2
H
PhyloP100
8.1
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.9
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.76
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.96
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.88
gMVP
0.78
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11547464; hg19: chr16-89986091; API