rs115480556

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.12275G>A​(p.Arg4092His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00123 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R4092C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 13 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 missense

Scores

1
3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.62
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009474486).
BP6
Variant 11-103399760-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103399760-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 302118.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00645 (981/152198) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0222 (923/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.021. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 467 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.12275G>A p.Arg4092His missense_variant 85/90 ENST00000650373.2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.12254G>A p.Arg4085His missense_variant 84/89 ENST00000375735.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.12275G>A p.Arg4092His missense_variant 85/90 NM_001080463.2 A1Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.12254G>A p.Arg4085His missense_variant 84/891 NM_001377.3 P3Q8NCM8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00645
AC:
981
AN:
152080
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00336
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00169
AC:
421
AN:
248794
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00118
AC XY:
159
AN XY:
134976
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000688
AC:
1006
AN:
1461564
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000601
AC XY:
437
AN XY:
727070
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00146
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00645
AC:
981
AN:
152198
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00628
AC XY:
467
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00332
Alfa
AF:
0.00135
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00720
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0214
AC:
81
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00184
AC:
222
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 11, 2023- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.13
T;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.40
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
.;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0095
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.2
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.15
T;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.073
T;.;.;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.65
MPC
0.087
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115480556; hg19: chr11-103270488; API