rs11552507

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000289.6(PFKM):​c.306C>T​(p.Ala102Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0223 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 491 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 32 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 459 hom. )

Consequence

PFKM
NM_000289.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.338

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PFKM (HGNC:8877): (phosphofructokinase, muscle) Three phosphofructokinase isozymes exist in humans: muscle, liver and platelet. These isozymes function as subunits of the mammalian tetramer phosphofructokinase, which catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Tetramer composition varies depending on tissue type. This gene encodes the muscle-type isozyme. Mutations in this gene have been associated with glycogen storage disease type VII, also known as Tarui disease. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
MIR6505 (HGNC:50104): (microRNA 6505) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.29).
BP6
Variant 12-48132936-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-48132936-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255761.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0189 (2871/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0289 (1963/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0278. There are 32 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1402 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 32 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PFKMNM_000289.6 linkc.306C>T p.Ala102Ala synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 23 ENST00000359794.11 NP_000280.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PFKMENST00000359794.11 linkc.306C>T p.Ala102Ala synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 23 1 NM_000289.6 ENSP00000352842.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0189
AC:
2872
AN:
152152
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00355
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0182
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0196
AC:
4916
AN:
251300
AF XY:
0.0192
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00351
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0297
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0281
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0225
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0227
AC:
33178
AN:
1461852
Hom.:
459
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0224
AC XY:
16265
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00338
AC:
113
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
455
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0369
AC:
963
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00466
AC:
402
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0309
AC:
1651
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00693
AC:
40
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0256
AC:
28479
AN:
1111984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0178
AC:
1072
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1931
3863
5794
7726
9657
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
954
1908
2862
3816
4770
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0189
AC:
2871
AN:
152270
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0188
AC XY:
1402
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00354
AC:
147
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0129
AC:
197
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0334
AC:
116
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000387
AC:
2
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
23
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0316
AC:
335
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0306
AC:
9
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0289
AC:
1963
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0180
AC:
38
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
151
302
454
605
756
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0279
Hom.:
117
Bravo
AF:
0.0165
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0261
EpiControl
AF:
0.0257

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type VII Benign:5
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 24, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
May 01, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.67
PhyloP100
-0.34
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11552507; hg19: chr12-48526719; API