rs11553502

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1062T>C​(p.Phe354Phe) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0311 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 913 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 166 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.030 ( 747 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.07

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
GARS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • spinal muscular atrophy, infantile, James type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 7-30615926-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30615926-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137440.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0675 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.900T>C p.Phe300Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.960T>C p.Phe320Phe synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 16 ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.894T>C p.Phe298Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.861T>C p.Phe287Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.693T>C p.Phe231Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.693T>C p.Phe231Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*776T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*162T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*400T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*932T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1004T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*7T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*513T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*351T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*494T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*776T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*162T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*400T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*932T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1004T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*7T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*513T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*351T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*494T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0396
AC:
6030
AN:
152176
Hom.:
162
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0695
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.155
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0343
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0330
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0249
AC:
6209
AN:
249552
AF XY:
0.0244
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0680
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000167
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0312
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0272
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0302
AC:
44205
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
747
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0296
AC XY:
21520
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0725
AC:
2426
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0223
AC:
996
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0240
AC:
626
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00762
AC:
657
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0139
AC:
741
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0314
AC:
181
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0329
AC:
36617
AN:
1111976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0324
AC:
1957
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2197
4394
6592
8789
10986
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1378
2756
4134
5512
6890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0397
AC:
6044
AN:
152294
Hom.:
166
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0383
AC XY:
2852
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0696
AC:
2892
AN:
41540
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0343
AC:
524
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0228
AC:
79
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00476
AC:
23
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
130
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0816
AC:
24
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0318
AC:
2161
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0326
AC:
69
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
292
583
875
1166
1458
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
66
132
198
264
330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0358
Hom.:
189
Bravo
AF:
0.0433
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0349
EpiControl
AF:
0.0330

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 29, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
5.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11553502; hg19: chr7-30655542; API