rs11553502

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1062T>C​(p.Phe354Phe) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0311 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 913 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 166 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.030 ( 747 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.07
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 7-30615926-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30615926-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137440.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-30615926-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0675 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.900T>C p.Phe300Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.1062T>C p.Phe354Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.960T>C p.Phe320Phe synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 16 ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.894T>C p.Phe298Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.861T>C p.Phe287Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.693T>C p.Phe231Phe synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.693T>C p.Phe231Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*776T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*162T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*400T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*932T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1004T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*7T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*513T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*351T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*494T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.1062T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*776T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*162T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*400T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*932T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1004T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*7T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*513T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*351T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*494T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0396
AC:
6030
AN:
152176
Hom.:
162
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0695
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.155
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0343
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0330
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0249
AC:
6209
AN:
249552
Hom.:
127
AF XY:
0.0244
AC XY:
3305
AN XY:
135394
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0680
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000167
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00735
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0312
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0272
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0302
AC:
44205
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
747
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0296
AC XY:
21520
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0725
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00762
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0329
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0324
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0397
AC:
6044
AN:
152294
Hom.:
166
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0383
AC XY:
2852
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0696
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0343
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0326
Alfa
AF:
0.0346
Hom.:
155
Bravo
AF:
0.0433
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0349
EpiControl
AF:
0.0330

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 29, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.74
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11553502; hg19: chr7-30655542; API