rs1156154
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000518177.2(EYA1):n.76-2821C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.568 in 151,758 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,138 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 26138 hom., cov: 31)
Consequence
EYA1
ENST00000518177.2 intron
ENST00000518177.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.104
Publications
6 publications found
Genes affected
EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
EYA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- branchio-oto-renal syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- branchiootorenal syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- branchiootic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
- branchiootic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.776 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.568 AC: 86153AN: 151640Hom.: 26091 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
86153
AN:
151640
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.568 AC: 86261AN: 151758Hom.: 26138 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.571 AC XY: 42358AN XY: 74174 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
86261
AN:
151758
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
42358
AN XY:
74174
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
32426
AN:
41406
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
8837
AN:
15234
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1432
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3897
AN:
5148
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2813
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
5029
AN:
10520
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
139
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
30099
AN:
67864
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1170
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1731
3463
5194
6926
8657
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
712
1424
2136
2848
3560
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2198
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.