rs11564717
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000360.4(TH):c.1200+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0141 in 1,612,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 208 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 201 hom. )
Consequence
TH
NM_000360.4 intron
NM_000360.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.512
Genes affected
TH (HGNC:11782): (tyrosine hydroxylase) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the conversion of tyrosine to dopamine. It is the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of catecholamines, hence plays a key role in the physiology of adrenergic neurons. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive Segawa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 11-2165659-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-2165659-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 263251.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr11-2165659-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0101 (1542/152212) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0176 (1199/67974). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0168. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 682 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TH | NM_000360.4 | c.1200+9C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000352909.8 | NP_000351.2 | |||
TH | NM_199292.3 | c.1293+9C>T | intron_variant | NP_954986.2 | ||||
TH | NM_199293.3 | c.1281+9C>T | intron_variant | NP_954987.2 | ||||
TH | XM_011520335.3 | c.1212+9C>T | intron_variant | XP_011518637.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TH | ENST00000352909.8 | c.1200+9C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000360.4 | ENSP00000325951.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0101 AC: 1542AN: 152094Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1542
AN:
152094
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00966 AC: 2403AN: 248780Hom.: 22 AF XY: 0.00990 AC XY: 1337AN XY: 135092
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2403
AN:
248780
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1337
AN XY:
135092
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0146 AC: 21255AN: 1460190Hom.: 201 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0143 AC XY: 10418AN XY: 726402
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
21255
AN:
1460190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10418
AN XY:
726402
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0101 AC: 1542AN: 152212Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00917 AC XY: 682AN XY: 74406
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1542
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
682
AN XY:
74406
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive DOPA responsive dystonia Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Apr 19, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 28, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Generalized dystonia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | TH gene mutations are associated with dystonias. However, more studies are required to ascertain the role of this particular variant (rs11564717) in triggering dystonia. - |
Transient Neonatal Diabetes, Dominant/Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at