rs11568305
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001377265.1(MAPT):c.1986G>A(p.Pro662Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.041 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,538 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.039 ( 120 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.041 ( 1418 hom. )
Consequence
MAPT
NM_001377265.1 synonymous
NM_001377265.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.86
Genes affected
MAPT (HGNC:6893): (microtubule associated protein tau) This gene encodes the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) whose transcript undergoes complex, regulated alternative splicing, giving rise to several mRNA species. MAPT transcripts are differentially expressed in the nervous system, depending on stage of neuronal maturation and neuron type. MAPT gene mutations have been associated with several neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, frontotemporal dementia, cortico-basal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 17-45996652-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-45996652-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 98211.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-45996652-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.86 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (MID) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.104 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPT | NM_001377265.1 | c.1986G>A | p.Pro662Pro | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000262410.10 | NP_001364194.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPT | ENST00000262410.10 | c.1986G>A | p.Pro662Pro | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_001377265.1 | ENSP00000262410.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0388 AC: 5900AN: 152108Hom.: 119 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5900
AN:
152108
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0352 AC: 8719AN: 247630Hom.: 190 AF XY: 0.0367 AC XY: 4930AN XY: 134424
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8719
AN:
247630
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4930
AN XY:
134424
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0412 AC: 60185AN: 1461530Hom.: 1418 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.0415 AC XY: 30148AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
60185
AN:
1461530
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
30148
AN XY:
727040
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0388 AC: 5903AN: 152226Hom.: 120 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0382 AC XY: 2840AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5903
AN:
152226
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2840
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
109
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 25, 2011 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 08, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12826737, 26159191, 18854867, 19091059, 9973279, 20020531, 16410051, 25671699) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
MAPT-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Frontotemporal dementia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at