Menu
GeneBe

rs11570058

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):c.786C>T(p.Thr262=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.114 in 1,571,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,203 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.088 ( 712 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 10491 hom. )

Consequence

MYBPC3
NM_000256.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.72
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYBPC3 (HGNC:7551): (myosin binding protein C3) MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein C. Myosin-binding protein C is a myosin-associated protein found in the cross-bridge-bearing zone (C region) of A bands in striated muscle. MYBPC3 is expressed exclusively in heart muscle and is a key regulator of cardiac contraction. Mutations in this gene are a frequent cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 11-47347892-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-47347892-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42793.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-47347892-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-47347892-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.72 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.122 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYBPC3NM_000256.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.786C>T p.Thr262= synonymous_variant 7/35 ENST00000545968.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYBPC3ENST00000545968.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.786C>T p.Thr262= synonymous_variant 7/355 NM_000256.3 P4Q14896-1
MYBPC3ENST00000399249.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.786C>T p.Thr262= synonymous_variant 7/345 A2
MYBPC3ENST00000544791.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.786C>T p.Thr262= synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 7/275

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0882
AC:
13420
AN:
152104
Hom.:
712
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0408
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0462
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0732
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0951
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0577
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.118
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.124
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0808
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0900
AC:
16455
AN:
182798
Hom.:
919
AF XY:
0.0909
AC XY:
8926
AN XY:
98182
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0422
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0456
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0666
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.114
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.126
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.101
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.116
AC:
165395
AN:
1419758
Hom.:
10491
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.115
AC XY:
80694
AN XY:
702194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0950
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0676
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.129
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.106
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0881
AC:
13418
AN:
152222
Hom.:
712
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0858
AC XY:
6387
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0407
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0730
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0951
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0580
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.118
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.124
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0799
Alfa
AF:
0.112
Hom.:
1402
Bravo
AF:
0.0830
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0400
AC:
139
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 18, 2008- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 08, 2011This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 4 Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 10, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCohesion PhenomicsOct 10, 2022- -
Left ventricular noncompaction 10 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 16, 2018- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 11, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
Cadd
Benign
0.23
Dann
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11570058; hg19: chr11-47369443; COSMIC: COSV57027046; API