rs11571117
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000537.4(REN):c.649G>A(p.Gly217Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00314 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 138 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000537.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REN | NM_000537.4 | c.649G>A | p.Gly217Arg | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000272190.9 | NP_000528.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REN | ENST00000272190.9 | c.649G>A | p.Gly217Arg | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_000537.4 | ENSP00000272190 | P1 | |
REN | ENST00000638118.1 | c.535G>A | p.Gly179Arg | missense_variant | 7/12 | 5 | ENSP00000490307 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0168 AC: 2550AN: 152136Hom.: 80 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00445 AC: 1119AN: 251490Hom.: 31 AF XY: 0.00296 AC XY: 402AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00173 AC: 2522AN: 1461890Hom.: 58 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1070AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0168 AC: 2553AN: 152254Hom.: 80 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0164 AC XY: 1221AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Kidney disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 12, 2016 | - - |
Renal tubular dysgenesis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at