rs11571654
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.2538A>C(p.Ser846=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000353 in 1,609,690 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S846S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.2538A>C | p.Ser846= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.2538A>C | p.Ser846= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000629 AC: 155AN: 246278Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000811 AC XY: 108AN XY: 133116
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000368 AC: 536AN: 1457350Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000513 AC XY: 372AN XY: 724690
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152340Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000295 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Oct 28, 2010 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Sep 19, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/) and frequency 0.0049 (South Asian), derived from ExAC (2014-12-17). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 10, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 14, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 07, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | BRCA2: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 12, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 15, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 06, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | May 09, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 28, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 11, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 24, 2015 | Variant Summary: The variant of interest causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with Mutation Taster predicting the variant to be a "polymorphism." 3/5 in silico programs via Alamut predict no significant effect on splicing and the removal of an ESE binding site, SRp40, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in a large, broad control population, ExAC with an allele frequency of 98/120626 (1/1231, including 2 homozygotes), which exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a BRCA2 variant of 1/1333. The variant of interest has been reported in affected individuals via publications, including a reported co-occurrence with another pathogenic BRCA1 variant (5404delG; De Silva et al 2001). In addition, multiple reputable databases/clinical laboratories (BIC, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and Invitae) cite the variant with a classification of "likely benign/benign." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Nov 16, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 23, 2023 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Ser846Ser variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. Two of five in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; however, this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant was identified in 5 of 5234 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Alsop 2012, Caux-Moncoutier 2011, Soumittra 2009); however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11571654) “With Benign, untested allele”, BIC (1X with no clinical importance), the ClinVar database (classified as benign by BIC and GeneDx; classification not provided by Invitae), and UMD (11X as an unclassified variant). The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 5 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), HAPMAP-GIH in 2 of 176 chromosomes (frequency: 0.011), Exome Variant Server ESP project in 2 of 8598 European American alleles. The variant was identified in several populations in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014), with the following allele counts and frequencies: South Asian (82/16468 alleles, frequency: 0.005), Latino (7/11470 alleles, frequency: 0.0006), European (Non-Finnish) (8/66348 alleles, frequency; 0.0001, and “Other” (1/904 alleles, frequency: 0.001). Notably two of the individuals tested in the ExAC database were homozygous for the variant (one South Asian and one Latino), increasing the likelihood that this variant may not have clinical significance. In addition, Myriad classifies this as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at