rs11571657
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5640T>G(p.Asn1880Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000517 in 1,612,424 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1880D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5640T>G | p.Asn1880Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5640T>G | p.Asn1880Lys | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00265 AC: 404AN: 152166Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000771 AC: 192AN: 249036Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000535 AC XY: 72AN XY: 134598
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000294 AC: 429AN: 1460140Hom.: 3 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.000252 AC XY: 183AN XY: 726230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00265 AC: 404AN: 152284Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00255 AC XY: 190AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Aug 01, 2008 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Asn1880Lys variant has been previously observed in 7/5248 (frequency: 0.001) proband chromosomes from individuals with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (Borg 2010, Haffty 2009, Real 2002, Weitzel 2005). This individuals racial origin is reported to be of African American ancestry and of the individuals reported in the literature with the p.Asn1880Lys variant, 3 were reported of African American descent. In addition, in the Exome Variant Server this variant was not found in any of the 8,600 Caucasian control chromosomes, but was found in 41/4365 (frequency: 0.009) African American control chromosomes increasing the likelihood that this variant is a benign polymorphism in this population of origin. It should also be noted that this lab has sequenced the BRCA2 gene in a limited number of African American individuals such that the full spectrum of benign variation has not yet been defined for this population, and increasing the possibility that this may be a benign variant. Future analysis could reveal that the p.Asn1880Lys variant is common in this population and therefore unlikely to be of clinical significance. It is listed in dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs11571657) with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.002 (1000 Genomes) further lending to a benign role for this variant. Finally, this residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein, further leaning to a benign role for this variant. In summary, we cannot rule out the possibility that this variant may contribute to the phenotype in this individual, but based on the above information this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 18, 2019 | Variant allele has low bioinformatic likelihood to encode a missense alteration affecting protein function (Missense prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND minor allele frequency 0.00909 (African), derived from gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer (2019-05-13). - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | May 23, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Oct 25, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 04, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 20, 2018 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 28, 2022 | The p.Asn1880Lys variant in BRCA2 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.92% (229/24894, 2 homozygotes) of African chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was classified as benign on Jun 18, 2019 by the ClinGen-approved ENIGMA expert panel (Variation ID 51896). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Dec 17, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21520273, 25637381, 11241844, 27884173, 26332594, 24728327, 11950811, 12624724, 9971877, 20104584, 19491284, 16030099, 22034289, 18724707, 12491487, 27741520) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | BRCA2: BP4, BS2 - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 03, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jul 12, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 24, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 18, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1Benign:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | May 08, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 27, 2020 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Oct 25, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at