rs11571833

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BA1BP5_StrongBS3

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.9976A>T variant in BRCA2 is predicted to cause a change in the length of the protein due to the insertion of a terminating codon instead of the usual Lysine at amino acid 3326 (p.Lys3326Ter). The highest non-cancer, non-founder population filter allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset, read depth ≥20) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset, read depth ≥20) is 0.00813 in the European (non-Finnish) population, which is above the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1 (BA1 met). Nonsense variant predicted to cause a premature stop codon that is predicted to escape nonsense mediated decay, and lead to truncation of a region with unknown protein function (sequence up to BRCA2:p.Glu3309 is maintained) (PVS1 not met). Reported by one calibrated study to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMID:29988080) (BS3 met). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 3.09E-263 (based on Cosegregation LR=0.001; Pathology LR=1.864E-35; Co-occurrence LR=0.0001; Case-Control LR=1.66E-221), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; PMID:18451181, Internal lab contributor).In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA2-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BA1, BS3, BP5_Very strong). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA026350/MONDO:0012933/097

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0060 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0081 ( 69 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 stop_gained

Scores

1
2
4

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:47O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.723

Publications

298 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP5
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS3
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.9976A>T p.Lys3326* stop_gained Exon 27 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.9976A>T p.Lys3326* stop_gained Exon 27 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.9607A>T p.Lys3203* stop_gained Exon 27 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2034A>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2034A>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00601
AC:
915
AN:
152244
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0352
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00510
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00683
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00849
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00660
AC:
1654
AN:
250748
AF XY:
0.00683
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00895
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00688
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00812
AC:
11863
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
69
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00826
AC XY:
6006
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00120
AC:
40
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00266
AC:
119
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00448
AC:
117
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00650
AC:
561
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00985
AC:
526
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00693
AC:
40
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00901
AC:
10022
AN:
1111978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00725
AC:
438
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
698
1396
2094
2792
3490
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
378
756
1134
1512
1890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00600
AC:
914
AN:
152362
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00585
AC XY:
436
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
48
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00510
AC:
78
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00547
AC:
19
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00683
AC:
33
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
111
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00850
AC:
578
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00615
AC:
13
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
45
90
136
181
226
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00705
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00539
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0113
AC:
42
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00934
AC:
36
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00272
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00837
AC:
72
ExAC
AF:
0.00701
AC:
851
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00862
EpiControl
AF:
0.00960

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:47Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:14Other:1
Oct 06, 2021
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2022
Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.9976A>T variant is classified as Benign (BS2) -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2014
Pathway Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 01, 2012
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Feb 22, 2016
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:10Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 13, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2017
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2014
Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

May 11, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:9
Aug 12, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.9976A>T (p.Lys3326X) variant results in a termination codon at the penultimate exon, predicted to cause a truncation of the last 93 amino acids. This variant is not expected to affect any known domain (InterPro) and no truncations downstream of this position have been reported to be pathogenic in literature and databases. This variant was found in 2327/296226 control chromosomes (including 8 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0078555, which is approximately 10 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, several clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as benign (14)/likely benign (1). Available family, co-occurrence and functional data also show that it is not a disease causing variant. Despite these, this variant is found at considerably high frequency, especially in patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer, raising a possibilty that it may be a risk variant. Using weighted logistic regression, Meeks et al 2016 analyzed data from the large iCOGS study including 76637 cancer case patients and 83796 control patients to estimate odds ratios (ORw) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for K3326X variant carriers in relation to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer risks, with weights defined as probability of not having a pathogenic BRCA2 variant. Other adjustments in the study were adjustment for attained age, consortium study site, and principal components of population structure. From the study, weighted ORs for invasive breast cancer and ovarian cancers were 1.28 (confidence interval 1.17-1.4; P-value=3.84x10e-3) and 1.26 (confidence interval 1.1-1.43; P-value=3.84x10e-3), respectively. The authors conclude that this study provides evidence that the K3326X variant is associated with risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers independent of other pathogenic variants in BRCA2. Hence this variant is a risk allele which attributes a significant but a low risk in development of breast or ovarian cancer. In addition, other genetic/lifestyle/environmental factors may also be playing a part in elevation of risk. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign for HBOC. -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Feb 02, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 27, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:4
Mar 11, 2015
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Nov 01, 2021
Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Jul 09, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 19, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Aug 02, 2013
Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 19, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:2
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Lys3326X variant was identified in 1577 of 158144 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.010) from various ethnicities in multinational cohorts of individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 1414 of 167882 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.008) from healthy individuals (Hadjisavvas 2004 15172753, Wagner 1999 9971877, Borg 2010 20104584, Claes 2003 12759930, Meeks 2016 26586665). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11571833) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (Benign by ENIGMA, DVD CHOP, Michigan Medical Genetics, CSER_CC_NCGL University of Washington Medical Center, Colour Genomics, Prevention Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl, Ambry Genetics, Laboatroy Corporation of America Study Description, Children's Mercy Hospital, Fulgent, Cancer Genetic and Genomic Laboratory BC, EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Queen's University Department of Pathology, ARUP, Women's College Hospital, BIC, SCRP, and Biesecker Lab, as likely benign by Illumina, CHEO, and Pathway Genomics and as pathogenic by GeneReviews.), in ClinVitae (7x as Benign in 4 entries including 3 from ClinVar and 1 from EmyClass, as Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity from Invitae and ClinVar, and as a polymorphism by kConFab), COSMIC (1x observed in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, as neutral), LOVD 3.0 (65x as does not affect function, affect unknown or unclassified), UMD-LSDB (114 entries, classified as neutral and reported as co-occuring with pathogenic BRCA2 and BRCA1 variants), BIC Database (301 entries, classification pending), and ARUP Laboratories (classified as not pathogenic or of no clinical significance). The variant was not identified in MutDB, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 111 individuals with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or brain cancer. The variant was identified in control databases in 1782 of 276718 chromosomes (13 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.006 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 35 of 23984 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Other in 48 of 6448 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), Latino in 95 of 34342 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), European Non-Finnish in 1089 of 126410 chromosomes (freq: 0.009), Ashkenazi Jewish in 41 of 10146 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Finnish in 266 of 25780 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), and South Asian in 208 of 30764 chromosomes (freq: 0.007) while the variant was not observed in the East Asian population. The c.9976A>T variant leads to a premature stop codon in the penultimate exon of BRCA2 and is predicted to cause a truncation of the last 93 amino acids. There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the significance of this variant. The variant was shown to have a 1.26 fold increase in breast cancer risk (in heterozygous form) or 5.78 increase risk (in homozygous form) (95% confidence interval p=1.2x10-5) and/or is in linkage disequilibrium with higher risk variants in a study looking at SNPs selected on the basis of genome wide association studies, genotyped in 45,290 cases and 41,880 controls from 41 studies (Michailidou 2013 23535729). A more recent study of the c.9976A>T variant identified 852/41081 carriers of the variant in women with breast cancer, and 322/14514 with ovarian cancer. They determined an odds ratio of adjusted for the probability of carrying a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant of 1.28 for the breast cancer group, 1.52 for the triple negative breast cancer group and 1.46 for the serous ovarian cancer group (Meeks 2016 26586665). A posterior probability model integrating causality models based on prior probability derived from evolutionary conservation and likelihoods of causality, indicate that this variant is not pathogenic (Lindor_2012_21990134). However, in vitro splicing assays on 31 BRCA2 variants showed this variant to be pathogenic despite not being pathogenic ba -

Apr 08, 2020
Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

ACMG Guidelines 2015 criteria -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Jun 11, 2024
ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The c.9976A>T variant in BRCA2 is predicted to cause a change in the length of the protein due to the insertion of a terminating codon instead of the usual Lysine at amino acid 3326 (p.Lys3326Ter). The highest non-cancer, non-founder population filter allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) is 0.00813 in the European (non-Finnish) population, which is above the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1 (BA1 met). Nonsense variant predicted to cause a premature stop codon that is predicted to escape nonsense mediated decay, and lead to truncation of a region with unknown protein function (sequence up to BRCA2:p.Glu3309 is maintained) (PVS1 not met). Reported by one calibrated study to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMID: 29988080) (BS3 met). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 3.09E-263 (based on Cosegregation LR=0.001; Pathology LR=1.864E-35; Co-occurrence LR=0.0001; Case-Control LR=1.66E-221), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; PMID: 18451181, Internal lab contributor). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA2-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BA1, BS3, BP5_Very strong). -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.026
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.27
CADD
Pathogenic
34
DANN
Uncertain
0.97
Eigen
Benign
0.0040
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.044
N
PhyloP100
0.72
Vest4
0.64
GERP RS
0.16
Mutation Taster
=142/58
disease causing (fs/PTC)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11571833; hg19: chr13-32972626; COSMIC: COSV66337127; COSMIC: COSV66337127; API