rs11571836
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.*532A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.202 in 196,350 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,599 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 3037 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 1562 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_000059.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.315
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 13-32399302-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32399302-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 209928.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32399302-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.38 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.*532A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 27/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.*532A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 27/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*2847A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 26/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*2847A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 26/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.190 AC: 28849AN: 152008Hom.: 3039 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
28849
AN:
152008
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.243 AC: 10763AN: 44224Hom.: 1562 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.246 AC XY: 5042AN XY: 20482
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
10763
AN:
44224
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
5042
AN XY:
20482
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.190 AC: 28841AN: 152126Hom.: 3037 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.194 AC XY: 14437AN XY: 74378
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
28841
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
14437
AN XY:
74378
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
870
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:2
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jan 12, 2015 | Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.3811 (Asian), 0.04675 (African), 0.2177 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 14, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23299404) - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at