rs115800498
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_022464.5(SIL1):c.368C>T(p.Thr123Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00705 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 65 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022464.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL1 | NM_022464.5 | c.368C>T | p.Thr123Ile | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000394817.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL1 | ENST00000394817.7 | c.368C>T | p.Thr123Ile | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_022464.5 | P1 | |
ENST00000512875.2 | n.529+8263G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00473 AC: 719AN: 152130Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00546 AC: 1374AN: 251448Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00568 AC XY: 772AN XY: 135884
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00730 AC: 10666AN: 1461786Hom.: 60 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00720 AC XY: 5235AN XY: 727186
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00472 AC: 719AN: 152248Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00455 AC XY: 339AN XY: 74432
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 01, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | SIL1: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 07, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 02, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 01, 2013 | - - |
Marinesco-Sjögren syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
SIL1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 08, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at