rs115839019

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_025216.3(WNT10A):​c.85C>T​(p.Leu29Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00154 in 1,604,828 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

WNT10A
NM_025216.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.09
Variant links:
Genes affected
WNT10A (HGNC:13829): (Wnt family member 10A) The WNT gene family consists of structurally related genes which encode secreted signaling proteins. These proteins have been implicated in oncogenesis and in several developmental processes, including regulation of cell fate and patterning during embryogenesis. This gene is a member of the WNT gene family. It is strongly expressed in the cell lines of promyelocytic leukemia and Burkitt's lymphoma. In addition, it and another family member, the WNT6 gene, are strongly coexpressed in colorectal cancer cell lines. The gene overexpression may play key roles in carcinogenesis through activation of the WNT-beta-catenin-TCF signaling pathway. This gene and the WNT6 gene are clustered in the chromosome 2q35 region. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 2-218881080-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-218881080-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 334392.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00887 (1351/152350) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0308 (1280/41592). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0294. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 632 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
WNT10ANM_025216.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.85C>T p.Leu29Leu synonymous_variant 1/4 ENST00000258411.8 NP_079492.2 Q9GZT5A0A2K8FR47
WNT10AXM_011511930.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.85C>T p.Leu29Leu synonymous_variant 1/3 XP_011510232.1
WNT10AXM_011511929.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.18-1081C>T intron_variant XP_011510231.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WNT10AENST00000258411.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.85C>T p.Leu29Leu synonymous_variant 1/41 NM_025216.3 ENSP00000258411.3 Q9GZT5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00880
AC:
1339
AN:
152232
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00189
AC:
424
AN:
224910
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00150
AC XY:
185
AN XY:
123088
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000351
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000405
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00107
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000777
AC:
1128
AN:
1452478
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000675
AC XY:
487
AN XY:
721548
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000473
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000217
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00153
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00887
AC:
1351
AN:
152350
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00848
AC XY:
632
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0308
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00372
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00425
Alfa
AF:
0.00426
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.00976
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

SchC6pf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia;C1835492:Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Tooth agenesis, selective, 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.96

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115839019; hg19: chr2-219745802; API