rs115850223

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):​c.2017G>A​(p.Asp673Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000577 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC40
NM_017950.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.35

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CCDC40 (HGNC:26090): (coiled-coil domain 40 molecular ruler complex subunit) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for motile cilia function. It functions in correct left-right axis formation by regulating the assembly of the inner dynein arm and the dynein regulatory complexes, which control ciliary beat. Mutations in this gene cause ciliary dyskinesia type 15, a disorder due to defects in cilia motility. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
CCDC40 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 15
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autoimmune disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007947803).
BP6
Variant 17-80084770-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80084770-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 215897.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00276 (421/152270) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00961 (399/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00883. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 180 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CCDC40NM_017950.4 linkc.2017G>A p.Asp673Asn missense_variant Exon 13 of 20 ENST00000397545.9 NP_060420.2
CCDC40NM_001243342.2 linkc.2017G>A p.Asp673Asn missense_variant Exon 13 of 18 NP_001230271.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CCDC40ENST00000397545.9 linkc.2017G>A p.Asp673Asn missense_variant Exon 13 of 20 5 NM_017950.4 ENSP00000380679.4
CCDC40ENST00000574799.5 linkn.1554G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 16 1
CCDC40ENST00000374877.7 linkc.2017G>A p.Asp673Asn missense_variant Exon 13 of 18 5 ENSP00000364011.3
CCDC40ENST00000572253.5 linkn.644G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 6 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00276
AC:
420
AN:
152152
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00961
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000734
AC:
183
AN:
249376
AF XY:
0.000554
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00918
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000840
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000795
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000330
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000350
AC:
511
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000305
AC XY:
222
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
386
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000827
AC:
37
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86234
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53382
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
8
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000261
AC:
29
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000811
AC:
49
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00276
AC:
421
AN:
152270
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00242
AC XY:
180
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00961
AC:
399
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000850
AC:
13
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
42
64
85
106
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000965
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00326
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00609
AC:
25
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000357
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000892
AC:
108
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Oct 04, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 28, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The CCDC40 p.Asp673Asn variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs115850223), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and as a VUS by Illumina Clinical Services for ciliary dyskinesia) and in LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign). The variant was also identified in control databases in 258 of 280770 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000919 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 215 of 24180 chromosomes (freq: 0.008892), Latino in 31 of 35360 chromosomes (freq: 0.000877), Other in 2 of 7146 chromosomes (freq: 0.00028), European (non-Finnish) in 9 of 128602 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007) and South Asian in 1 of 30594 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian or European (Finnish) populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence however in silico or computational prediction software programs, (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing and the creation of a new 5' splice site. The p.Asp673 residue is not conserved in mammals however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Oct 30, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.60
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.39
.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.78
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.80
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0079
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;L
PhyloP100
2.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.022
D;D
Polyphen
0.078
.;B
Vest4
0.29
MVP
0.19
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
0.93
Varity_R
0.078
gMVP
0.31
Mutation Taster
=92/8
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115850223; hg19: chr17-78058569; API