rs115857753

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):​c.1895C>T​(p.Pro632Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00195 in 1,613,688 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P632A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 37 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 23 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0019832253).
BP6
Variant 15-89645920-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89645920-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129407.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0106 (1620/152222) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0375 (1557/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.036. There are 37 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 813 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 37 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KIF7NM_198525.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1895C>T p.Pro632Leu missense_variant 8/19 ENST00000394412.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KIF7ENST00000394412.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1895C>T p.Pro632Leu missense_variant 8/195 NM_198525.3 P2
KIF7ENST00000696512.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2018C>T p.Pro673Leu missense_variant 8/19 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0106
AC:
1617
AN:
152104
Hom.:
37
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0375
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00670
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00264
AC:
663
AN:
250964
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
258
AN XY:
135692
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00104
AC:
1525
AN:
1461466
Hom.:
23
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000879
AC XY:
639
AN XY:
727076
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000638
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00187
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0106
AC:
1620
AN:
152222
Hom.:
37
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
813
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0375
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00664
Alfa
AF:
0.00352
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.0117
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0355
AC:
156
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00335
AC:
407
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 23, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaJun 08, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 16, 2015- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsDec 02, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023KIF7: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Acrocallosal syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
0.69
DANN
Benign
0.42
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.094
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.9
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.010
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.43
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0020
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.45
N
REVEL
Benign
0.070
Sift
Benign
0.060
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.13
MVP
0.17
MPC
0.018
ClinPred
0.0023
T
GERP RS
-5.7
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115857753; hg19: chr15-90189151; API