rs115891952

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.7023C>T(p.Ile2341Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,612,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0077 ( 15 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

ASPM
NM_018136.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.686

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ASPM (HGNC:19048): (assembly factor for spindle microtubules) This gene is the human ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster 'abnormal spindle' gene (asp), which is essential for normal mitotic spindle function in embryonic neuroblasts. Studies in mouse also suggest a role of this gene in mitotic spindle regulation, with a preferential role in regulating neurogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with microcephaly primary type 5. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

ASPM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen

ASPM links:

ENSG00000300054 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000300054 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).

BP6

Variant 1-197102228-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-197102228-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 157861.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.686 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00769 (1167/151824) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0263 (1091/41454). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.025. There are 15 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 566 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 15 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ASPM	NM_018136.5 link	c.7023C>T	p.Ile2341Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 28	ENST00000367409.9	NP_060606.3	Q8IZT6-1B3KWI2
ASPM	NM_001206846.2 link	c.4066-6064C>T		intron_variant	Intron 17 of 26		NP_001193775.1	Q8IZT6-2B3KWI2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ASPM	ENST00000367409.9 link	c.7023C>T	p.Ile2341Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 28	1	NM_018136.5	ENSP00000356379.4		Q8IZT6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00768

AC:

1165

AN:

151706

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0263

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00336

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00814

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00229

AC:

574

AN:

250162

AF XY:

0.00166

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0298

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00177

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000160

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000933

AC:

1363

AN:

1460878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000821

AC XY:

597

AN XY:

726754

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0297

AC:

993

AN:

33416

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00211

AC:

AN:

44602

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26090

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39680

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000928

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53318

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00295

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000981

AC:

109

AN:

1111436

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00235

AC:

142

AN:

60340

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

196

293

391

489

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

102

136

170

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00769

AC:

1167

AN:

151824

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00763

AC XY:

566

AN XY:

74220

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0263

AC:

1091

AN:

41454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00336

AC:

AN:

15184

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5138

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

67822

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00806

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

175

234

292

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00454

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00882

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 27, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 18, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 10, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

5.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

-0.69

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over