rs115992196

chr14-102042069-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.12159A>T(p.Gly4053=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00158 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 (20 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00083 (17 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.70

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
• BP6: Variant 14-102042069-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102042069-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 238993.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102042069-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.7 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00881 (1340/152180) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0312 (1295/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0298. There are 20 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 624 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 1335 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.12159A>T	p.Gly4053=	synonymous_variant	66/78	ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.12159A>T	p.Gly4053=	synonymous_variant	66/78	1	NM_001376.5	P1
	ENST00000553701.1	n.347-5300T>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00878 AC: 1335 AN: 152062 Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0312

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00197

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000415

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00224 AC: 563 AN: 251486 Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00157 AC XY: 214 AN XY: 135918

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0313

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00142

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000489

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000830 AC: 1213 AN: 1461894 Hom.: 17 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000716 AC XY: 521 AN XY: 727248

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0304

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00163

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000198

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00156

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00881 AC: 1340 AN: 152180 Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00839 AC XY: 624 AN XY: 74402

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0312

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00196

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00473

Alfa AF: 0.00280 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00989

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Mar 30, 2017	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 02, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Feb 01, 2024	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Mar 21, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.82
Cadd	Benign	3.6
Dann	Benign	0.76
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115992196; hg19: chr14-102508406;