rs116035034
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):c.5281C>A(p.Arg1761=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00489 in 1,608,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 362 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 206 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 156 hom. )
Consequence
MYH14
NM_001145809.2 synonymous
NM_001145809.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0780
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
?
Variant 19-50293257-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50293257-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 178617.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50293257-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.078 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0854 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH14 | NM_001145809.2 | c.5281C>A | p.Arg1761= | synonymous_variant | 38/43 | ENST00000642316.2 | |
MYH14 | NM_001077186.2 | c.5182C>A | p.Arg1728= | synonymous_variant | 37/42 | ||
MYH14 | NM_024729.4 | c.5158C>A | p.Arg1720= | synonymous_variant | 36/41 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH14 | ENST00000642316.2 | c.5281C>A | p.Arg1761= | synonymous_variant | 38/43 | NM_001145809.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0255 AC: 3883AN: 152086Hom.: 206 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
3883
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00638 AC: 1520AN: 238226Hom.: 71 AF XY: 0.00524 AC XY: 679AN XY: 129662
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1520
AN:
238226
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
679
AN XY:
129662
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00273 AC: 3982AN: 1456544Hom.: 156 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00241 AC XY: 1748AN XY: 723950
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3982
AN:
1456544
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1748
AN XY:
723950
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0255 AC: 3880AN: 152204Hom.: 206 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0244 AC XY: 1816AN XY: 74422
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
3880
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1816
AN XY:
74422
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 23, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Arg1761Arg in Exon 38 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 8.3% (284/3432) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs116035034). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 23, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at