rs116272698

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000137.4(FAH):c.483C>T(p.Gly161Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0086 ( 19 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

FAH
NM_000137.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.117

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FAH (HGNC:3579): (fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase) Predicted to enable fumarylacetoacetase activity. Predicted to be involved in L-phenylalanine catabolic process; homogentisate catabolic process; and tyrosine catabolic process. Predicted to act upstream of or within arginine catabolic process. Located in extracellular exosome. Implicated in tyrosinemia type I. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

FAH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tyrosinemia type I
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen

FAH links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).

BP6

Variant 15-80168079-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-80168079-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 381848.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.117 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0086 (1310/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0294 (1223/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0281. There are 19 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 617 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FAH	NM_000137.4 link	c.483C>T	p.Gly161Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14	ENST00000561421.6	NP_000128.1	P16930-1A0A384P5L6
FAH	NM_001374377.1 link	c.483C>T	p.Gly161Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 15		NP_001361306.1
FAH	NM_001374380.1 link	c.483C>T	p.Gly161Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 15		NP_001361309.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FAH	ENST00000561421.6 link	c.483C>T	p.Gly161Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14	1	NM_000137.4	ENSP00000453347.2		P16930-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00860

AC:

1308

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0295

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00438

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00669

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00229

AC:

575

AN:

251480

AF XY:

0.00174

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0313

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000703

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000842

AC:

1231

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000697

AC XY:

507

AN XY:

727226

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0293

AC:

981

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00190

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000306

AC:

AN:

1111976

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00192

AC:

116

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.463

Heterozygous variant carriers

140

211

281

351

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

102

136

170

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00860

AC:

1310

AN:

152278

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00829

AC XY:

617

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0294

AC:

1223

AN:

41538

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00438

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00662

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

121

182

242

303

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00391

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0104

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tyrosinemia type I

Benign:3

May 13, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 18, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 02, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

7.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.79

PhyloP100

-0.12

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over