rs116551057

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.4548C>T(p.Ser1516Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000181 in 1,612,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000092 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0860

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006029457).

BP6

Variant 1-235788841-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235788841-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 702188.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-235788841-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.086 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00103 (157/152112) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00357 (148/41496). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0031. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 70 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LYST	NM_000081.4 link	c.4548C>T	p.Ser1516Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 53	ENST00000389793.7	NP_000072.2	Q99698-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LYST	ENST00000389793.7 link	c.4548C>T	p.Ser1516Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 53	5	NM_000081.4	ENSP00000374443.2	Q99698-1
LYST	ENST00000489585.5 link	n.4548C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 13 of 23	1		ENSP00000513166.1	Q99698-2
LYST	ENST00000492844.1 link	n.8C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2	3
LYST	ENST00000697178.1 link	n.4121C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 52			ENSP00000513163.1	A0A8V8TKT6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

151994

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00355

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000255

AC:

AN:

250636

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000207

AC XY:

AN XY:

135454

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00320

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000924

AC:

135

AN:

1460866

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000812

AC XY:

AN XY:

726796

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00296

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000199

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00357

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000131

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000979

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00272

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000313

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.71

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

5.0

DANN

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

-0.80

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.92

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.054

LIST_S2

Benign

0.35

M_CAP

Benign

0.00056

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0060

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

Vest4

0.071

MVP

0.34

ClinPred

0.0030

GERP RS

-1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over