rs116551057

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.4548C>T(p.Ser1516Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000181 in 1,612,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000092 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0860

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Chediak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006029457).

BP6

Variant 1-235788841-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235788841-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 702188.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.086 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00103 (157/152112) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00357 (148/41496). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0031. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 70 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LYST	NM_000081.4 link	c.4548C>T	p.Ser1516Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 53	ENST00000389793.7	NP_000072.2	Q99698-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LYST	ENST00000389793.7 link	c.4548C>T	p.Ser1516Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 53	5	NM_000081.4	ENSP00000374443.2	Q99698-1
LYST	ENST00000489585.5 link	n.4548C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 13 of 23	1		ENSP00000513166.1	Q99698-2
LYST	ENST00000492844.1 link	n.8C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2	3
LYST	ENST00000697178.1 link	n.4121C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 52			ENSP00000513163.1	A0A8V8TKT6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

151994

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00355

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000255

AC:

AN:

250636

AF XY:

0.000207

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00320

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000924

AC:

135

AN:

1460866

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000812

AC XY:

AN XY:

726796

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00296

AC:

AN:

33456

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

44710

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39626

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86234

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53394

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1111190

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00357

AC:

148

AN:

41496

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

15272

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10578

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67984

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000762

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000979

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00272

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000313

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.71

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

5.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.16

Eigen

Benign

-0.80

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.92

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.054

LIST_S2

Benign

0.35

M_CAP

Benign

0.00056

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0060

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

PhyloP100

0.086

Vest4

0.071

MVP

0.34

ClinPred

0.0030

GERP RS

-1.8

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over