rs116657359
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000112.4(SLC26A2):c.2046G>A(p.Leu682=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000295 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SLC26A2
NM_000112.4 synonymous
NM_000112.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.404
Genes affected
SLC26A2 (HGNC:10994): (solute carrier family 26 member 2) The diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter is a transmembrane glycoprotein implicated in the pathogenesis of several human chondrodysplasias. It apparently is critical in cartilage for sulfation of proteoglycans and matrix organization. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 5-149981639-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149981639-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255132.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.404 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A2 | NM_000112.4 | c.2046G>A | p.Leu682= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000286298.5 | |
SLC26A2 | XM_017009191.3 | c.2046G>A | p.Leu682= | synonymous_variant | 3/4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A2 | ENST00000286298.5 | c.2046G>A | p.Leu682= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_000112.4 | P1 | |
SLC26A2 | ENST00000503336.1 | c.372+3288G>A | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000335 AC: 51AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
51
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000578 AC: 145AN: 251040Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000494 AC XY: 67AN XY: 135662
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
145
AN:
251040
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
135662
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000291 AC: 425AN: 1461780Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000260 AC XY: 189AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
425
AN:
1461780
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
189
AN XY:
727202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000335 AC: 51AN: 152310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 21AN XY: 74478
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
51
AN:
152310
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74478
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Atelosteogenesis type II Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Achondrogenesis, type IB Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Sulfate transporter-related osteochondrodysplasia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Diastrophic dysplasia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Diastrophic dysplasia;C0265274:Achondrogenesis, type IB;C1847593:Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4;C1850554:Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at