Menu
GeneBe

rs116686341

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_014425.5(INVS):c.1943A>G(p.Asn648Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000675 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N648N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

INVS
NM_014425.5 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.174
Variant links:
Genes affected
INVS (HGNC:17870): (inversin) This gene encodes a protein containing multiple ankyrin domains and two IQ calmodulin-binding domains. The encoded protein may function in renal tubular development and function, and in left-right axis determination. This protein interacts with nephrocystin and infers a connection between primary cilia function and left-right axis determination. A similar protein in mice interacts with calmodulin. Mutations in this gene have been associated with nephronophthisis type 2. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005371213).
BP6
Variant 9-100284478-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-100284478-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 411193.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}. Variant chr9-100284478-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000788 (12/152364) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00231 (12/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00134. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
INVSNM_014425.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1943A>G p.Asn648Ser missense_variant 13/17 ENST00000262457.7
INVSNM_001318381.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1655A>G p.Asn552Ser missense_variant 14/18
INVSNM_001318382.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.965A>G p.Asn322Ser missense_variant 13/17
INVSNR_134606.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.2141A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 13/17

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
INVSENST00000262457.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1943A>G p.Asn648Ser missense_variant 13/171 NM_014425.5 A2Q9Y283-1
INVSENST00000262456.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1943A>G p.Asn648Ser missense_variant 13/185 P4Q9Y283-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000224
AC:
56
AN:
250414
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000199
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
135640
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000620
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00300
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000664
AC:
97
AN:
1461798
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000591
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
727204
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152364
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000537
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000160
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000136
ExAC
AF:
0.000157
AC:
19
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 26, 2016- -
Infantile nephronophthisis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
Cadd
Benign
0.22
Dann
Benign
0.53
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.20
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.024
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0069
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0054
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.74
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.017
Sift
Benign
0.36
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B
Vest4
0.029
MVP
0.33
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
-0.071
Varity_R
0.028
gMVP
0.048

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116686341; hg19: chr9-103046760; API