rs116775947

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_012233.3(RAB3GAP1):​c.913A>G​(p.Ile305Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00761 in 1,612,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 84 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0066 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0077 ( 80 hom. )

Consequence

RAB3GAP1
NM_012233.3 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0480

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAB3GAP1 (HGNC:17063): (RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of a Rab GTPase activating protein. The encoded protein forms a heterodimer with a non-catalytic subunit to specifically regulate the activity of members of the Rab3 subfamily of small G proteins. This protein mediates the hydrolysis of GTP bound Rab3 to the GDP bound form. Mutations in this gene are associated with Warburg micro syndrome. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]
RAB3GAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Warburg micro syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Warburg micro syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • cataract-intellectual disability-hypogonadism syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005227387).
BP6
Variant 2-135126596-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-135126596-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130072.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00655 (998/152310) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0228 (110/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0194. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 463 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RAB3GAP1NM_012233.3 linkc.913A>G p.Ile305Val missense_variant Exon 11 of 24 ENST00000264158.13 NP_036365.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAB3GAP1ENST00000264158.13 linkc.913A>G p.Ile305Val missense_variant Exon 11 of 24 1 NM_012233.3 ENSP00000264158.8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00657
AC:
1000
AN:
152192
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00785
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00860
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00874
AC:
2198
AN:
251426
AF XY:
0.00985
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00512
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00928
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00961
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00773
AC:
11279
AN:
1459934
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00830
AC XY:
6031
AN XY:
726446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00120
AC:
40
AN:
33438
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00521
AC:
233
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0198
AC:
517
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000757
AC:
3
AN:
39638
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0187
AC:
1616
AN:
86196
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
130
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
81
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00735
AC:
8160
AN:
1110330
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00827
AC:
499
AN:
60314
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
539
1079
1618
2158
2697
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
288
576
864
1152
1440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00655
AC:
998
AN:
152310
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00621
AC XY:
463
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00164
AC:
68
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00784
AC:
120
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0202
AC:
70
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0228
AC:
110
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00254
AC:
27
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00860
AC:
585
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00757
AC:
16
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
56
112
168
224
280
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00886
Hom.:
27
Bravo
AF:
0.00631
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00863
AC:
32
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00597
AC:
23
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0100
AC:
86
ExAC
AF:
0.00893
AC:
1084
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00577
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0118
EpiControl
AF:
0.0122

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Sep 23, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 29, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

not provided Benign:3
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

RAB3GAP1-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 15, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Warburg micro syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.60
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.68
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.061
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.26
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0052
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;L;.
PhyloP100
0.048
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.27
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.097
Sift
Benign
0.34
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;T;T
Vest4
0.13
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
-5.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.028
gMVP
0.29
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116775947; hg19: chr2-135884166; API