rs116833707
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.9181G>A(p.Glu3061Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000158 in 1,614,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00078 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000093 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
10
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.24
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015765399).
BP6
Variant 17-18159299-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18159299-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 228972.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=2}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | c.9181G>A | p.Glu3061Lys | missense_variant | 54/66 | ENST00000647165.2 | NP_057323.3 | |
MYO15A | XM_017024715.3 | c.9184G>A | p.Glu3062Lys | missense_variant | 52/64 | XP_016880204.1 | ||
MYO15A | XM_017024714.3 | c.9121G>A | p.Glu3041Lys | missense_variant | 51/63 | XP_016880203.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | c.9181G>A | p.Glu3061Lys | missense_variant | 54/66 | NM_016239.4 | ENSP00000495481 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000783 AC: 119AN: 152004Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
119
AN:
152004
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 46AN: 249540Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 16AN XY: 135396
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
249540
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135396
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000930 AC: 136AN: 1461878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000756 AC XY: 55AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
136
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
727234
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000782 AC: 119AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000968 AC XY: 72AN XY: 74382
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
119
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
74382
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
25
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 11, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 14, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 04, 2020 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 11, 2017 | Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Glu3061Lys va riant in MYO15A has been previously reported by our laboratory in two individual s with hearing loss, but a variant affecting the second copy of the gene was not identified in either individual. This variant has been identified in 0.28% (66/ 23988) of African chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http:/ /gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs116833707). Although this variant has been s een in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pa thogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not p rovide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Glu3061Lys variant is uncertain, its frequen cy in the general population suggests that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/ AMP Criteria applied: BS1_Supporting. - |
MYO15A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 21, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D;D;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;L;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;.;D;.;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
.;T;.;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;.;D;.;D;D
Polyphen
0.98
.;D;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at