rs116888866

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004415.4(DSP):c.7916G>A(p.Arg2639Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000535 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00050 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

DSP
NM_004415.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0

Variant links:

Genes affected

DSP (HGNC:3052): (desmoplakin) This gene encodes a protein that anchors intermediate filaments to desmosomal plaques and forms an obligate component of functional desmosomes. Mutations in this gene are the cause of several cardiomyopathies and keratodermas, including skin fragility-woolly hair syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DSP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007822186).

BP6

Variant 6-7585178-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163287.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=12, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000499 (76/152268) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0128 (66/5174). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSP	NM_004415.4 link	c.7916G>A	p.Arg2639Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	ENST00000379802.8	NP_004406.2	P15924-1B4DKX6
DSP	NM_001319034.2 link	c.6587G>A	p.Arg2196Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24		NP_001305963.1	P15924-3B4DKX6
DSP	NM_001008844.3 link	c.6119G>A	p.Arg2040Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24		NP_001008844.1	P15924-2B4DKX6Q4LE79

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSP	ENST00000379802.8 link	c.7916G>A	p.Arg2639Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	1	NM_004415.4	ENSP00000369129.3	P15924-1
DSP	ENST00000418664.2 link	c.6119G>A	p.Arg2040Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	1		ENSP00000396591.2	P15924-2
DSP	ENST00000710359.1 link	c.6587G>A	p.Arg2196Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24			ENSP00000518230.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000500

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000893

AC:

224

AN:

250880

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000862

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

135656

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000706

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000538

AC:

787

AN:

1461868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000524

AC XY:

381

AN XY:

727228

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0168

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000487

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000414

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000447

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000499

AC:

AN:

152268

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000645

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00125

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000592

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000567

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000972

AC:

118

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 18, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Arg2639Gln in exon 24 of DSP: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.2% (105/8630) of East Asian chromos omes by the by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org). In one study this variant has been identified in 4 Taiwanese individuals with ARVC, but was also identified in 1.3% (8/600) control chromosomes (Bao 201 3). -

Feb 17, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 17, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: DSP c.7916G>A (p.Arg2639Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in a plectin repeat (IPR001101) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00092 in 252300 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.011 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1100-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DSP causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.7916G>A has been reported in the literature in East Asian individuals affected with Arrhythmia (Yu_2008, Bao_2013, Sato_2015, Zhao_2016), but it was also found in several controls (Bao_2013). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated a weak impact on the binding of the DSP C-terminus to the tested intermediate filaments (IF) proteins (Favre_2018). Nine other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jul 30, 2014

Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. We consider this a variant of uncertain significance, probably benign, based on the weak case data, the mismatch with the phenotype, and that the variant is common in Asians. The variant has been seen in one Taiwanese patient with ARVC (Yu et al 2008) and one Chinese patient with ARVC (Bao et al 2013). However, it is also seen in Asian controls (reviewed below). In silico analysis predicts the variant to be probably damaging. The arginine at codon 2639 is conserved across species. The GeneDx report notes that another variant of uncertain significance has been reported in association with ARVC at this codon (p.Arg2639Trp), but that no other nearby variants are listed in HGMD. There are no nearby variants listed in www.arvcdatabase.info. In total the variant has been seen in 30 of 7179 published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets, with ~5% of Asians in two different samples having the variant. There is no variation at codon 2639 listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset, which currently includes variant calls on ~6500 Caucasian and African American individuals (as of April 23rd, 2014). Note that this dataset does not match the patient's ancestry (Japanese). Per the GeneDx report, the variant was observed in 14 of 279 Asian individuals in the 1000 genomes sample and 16 of 300 Chinese individuals studied by Bao et al (2013). The variant was not observed in 100 Tawainese individuals studied by Yu et al (2008). -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma

Benign:2

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 23, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Oct 20, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 26, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jan 08, 2024

Dept of Medical Biology, Uskudar University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Criteria: PP3, BS1 -

Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1

Aug 22, 2014

Blueprint Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8;C1854063:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa

Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Woolly hair-skin fragility syndrome

Benign:1

Mar 06, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 23, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25693453, 20400443, 26585738, 24125834, 23911551, 20981092, 26332594, 18632414, 28471438, 32344918, 31402444) -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 26, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

DSP-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 10, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.26

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.022

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.27

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.75

D;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.91

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.90

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0078

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.18

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

2.9

M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.62

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.60

Sift

Benign

0.065

T;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.041

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.

Vest4

0.81

MVP

0.80

MPC

0.86

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

5.8

Varity_R

0.50

gMVP

0.72

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over