Menu
GeneBe

rs116888866

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_004415.4(DSP):c.7916G>A(p.Arg2639Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000535 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2639W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00050 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

DSP
NM_004415.4 missense

Scores

6
8
4

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0
Variant links:
Genes affected
DSP (HGNC:3052): (desmoplakin) This gene encodes a protein that anchors intermediate filaments to desmosomal plaques and forms an obligate component of functional desmosomes. Mutations in this gene are the cause of several cardiomyopathies and keratodermas, including skin fragility-woolly hair syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007822186).
BP6
Variant 6-7585178-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163287.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=11, Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr6-7585178-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000499 (76/152268) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0128 (66/5174). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0103. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DSPNM_004415.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7916G>A p.Arg2639Gln missense_variant 24/24 ENST00000379802.8
DSPNM_001319034.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6587G>A p.Arg2196Gln missense_variant 24/24
DSPNM_001008844.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln missense_variant 24/24

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DSPENST00000379802.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.7916G>A p.Arg2639Gln missense_variant 24/241 NM_004415.4 P2P15924-1
DSPENST00000418664.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6119G>A p.Arg2040Gln missense_variant 24/241 A2P15924-2
DSPENST00000710359.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.6587G>A p.Arg2196Gln missense_variant 24/24 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000500
AC:
76
AN:
152150
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000893
AC:
224
AN:
250880
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000862
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
135656
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000706
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000538
AC:
787
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000524
AC XY:
381
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000487
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000447
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000499
AC:
76
AN:
152268
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000645
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000592
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000567
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000972
AC:
118
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 18, 2016Arg2639Gln in exon 24 of DSP: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.2% (105/8630) of East Asian chromos omes by the by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org). In one study this variant has been identified in 4 Taiwanese individuals with ARVC, but was also identified in 1.3% (8/600) control chromosomes (Bao 201 3). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 17, 2020Variant summary: DSP c.7916G>A (p.Arg2639Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in a plectin repeat (IPR001101) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00092 in 252300 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.011 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1100-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DSP causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.7916G>A has been reported in the literature in East Asian individuals affected with Arrhythmia (Yu_2008, Bao_2013, Sato_2015, Zhao_2016), but it was also found in several controls (Bao_2013). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated a weak impact on the binding of the DSP C-terminus to the tested intermediate filaments (IF) proteins (Favre_2018). Nine other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityJul 30, 2014Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. We consider this a variant of uncertain significance, probably benign, based on the weak case data, the mismatch with the phenotype, and that the variant is common in Asians. The variant has been seen in one Taiwanese patient with ARVC (Yu et al 2008) and one Chinese patient with ARVC (Bao et al 2013). However, it is also seen in Asian controls (reviewed below). In silico analysis predicts the variant to be probably damaging. The arginine at codon 2639 is conserved across species. The GeneDx report notes that another variant of uncertain significance has been reported in association with ARVC at this codon (p.Arg2639Trp), but that no other nearby variants are listed in HGMD. There are no nearby variants listed in www.arvcdatabase.info. In total the variant has been seen in 30 of 7179 published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets, with ~5% of Asians in two different samples having the variant. There is no variation at codon 2639 listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset, which currently includes variant calls on ~6500 Caucasian and African American individuals (as of April 23rd, 2014). Note that this dataset does not match the patient's ancestry (Japanese). Per the GeneDx report, the variant was observed in 14 of 279 Asian individuals in the 1000 genomes sample and 16 of 300 Chinese individuals studied by Bao et al (2013). The variant was not observed in 100 Tawainese individuals studied by Yu et al (2008). -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 20, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 26, 2018- -
Long QT syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept of Medical Biology, Uskudar UniversityJan 08, 2024Criteria: PP3, BS1 -
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsAug 22, 2014- -
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8;C1854063:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 17, 2024- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Woolly hair-skin fragility syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 23, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25693453, 20400443, 26585738, 24125834, 23911551, 20981092, 26332594, 18632414, 28471438, 32344918, 31402444) -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 26, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
DSP-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 10, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.26
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.022
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.27
Cadd
Pathogenic
29
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.75
D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.91
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.3
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Benign
0.065
T;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.041
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.86
ClinPred
0.20
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.50
gMVP
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116888866; hg19: chr6-7585411; COSMIC: COSV65793014; API