rs116907814

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_014363.6(SACS):c.810T>G(p.Phe270Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000825 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00077 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

SACS
NM_014363.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.100

Variant links:

Genes affected

SACS (HGNC:10519): (sacsin molecular chaperone) This gene encodes the sacsin protein, which includes a UbL domain at the N-terminus, a DnaJ domain, and a HEPN domain at the C-terminus. The gene is highly expressed in the central nervous system, also found in skin, skeletal muscles and at low levels in the pancreas. This gene includes a very large exon spanning more than 12.8 kb. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by early-onset cerebellar ataxia with spasticity and peripheral neuropathy. The authors of a publication on the effects of siRNA-mediated sacsin knockdown concluded that sacsin protects against mutant ataxin-1 and suggest that "the large multi-domain sacsin protein is able to recruit Hsp70 chaperone action and has the potential to regulate the effects of other ataxia proteins" (Parfitt et al., PubMed: 19208651). A pseudogene associated with this gene is located on chromosome 11. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

SACS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0076864064).

BP6

Variant 13-23355802-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-23355802-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 448222.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr13-23355802-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00138 (210/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00112 (76/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000915. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 131 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SACS	NM_014363.6 link	c.810T>G	p.Phe270Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 10	ENST00000382292.9	NP_055178.3	Q9NZJ4-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SACS	ENST00000382292.9 link	c.810T>G	p.Phe270Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 10	5	NM_014363.6	ENSP00000371729.3		Q9NZJ4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00139

AC:

211

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00136

AC:

342

AN:

251444

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00135

AC XY:

184

AN XY:

135890

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000783

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000767

AC:

1121

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000773

AC XY:

562

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00895

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000551

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000414

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00138

AC:

210

AN:

152332

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00176

AC XY:

131

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000722

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000348

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000809

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000988

AC:

120

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charlevoix-Saguenay spastic ataxia

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Feb 26, 2021

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Sep 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 01, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SACS: BS1, BS2 -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 07, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Spastic paraplegia

Benign:1

Dec 02, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

SACS-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 10, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia

Benign:1

Apr 08, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.37

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.34

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

8.2

DANN

Benign

0.76

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.92

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.80

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.61

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.049

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0077

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.60

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.76

N;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Benign

1.2

N;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.31

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

T;.;.

Polyphen

0.0

B;.;.

Vest4

0.25

MutPred

0.39

Gain of catalytic residue at N265 (P = 0);Gain of catalytic residue at N265 (P = 0);Gain of catalytic residue at N265 (P = 0);

MVP

0.46

ClinPred

0.0033

GERP RS

-3.8

Varity_R

0.32

gMVP

0.49

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over