rs116990436

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.5418C>T(p.Ile1806Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00131 in 1,614,176 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.22

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).

BP6

Variant 2-26461811-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26461811-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 48261.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.22 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00175 (267/152290) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0421 (218/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0375. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.5418C>T	p.Ile1806Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 43 of 47	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_194323.3 link	c.3117C>T	p.Ile1039Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 29	ENST00000339598.8	NP_919304.1	Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.5418C>T	p.Ile1806Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 43 of 47	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000339598.8 link	c.3117C>T	p.Ile1039Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 29	1	NM_194323.3	ENSP00000344521.3		Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00175

AC:

266

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00164

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0420

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00336

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00361

AC:

909

AN:

251482

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00350

AC XY:

476

AN XY:

135914

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0475

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00195

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00126

AC:

1840

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00123

AC XY:

891

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0397

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00321

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00175

AC:

267

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00167

AC XY:

124

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00163

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0421

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00380

Alfa

AF:

0.000231

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00180

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0150

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 22, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 01, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Ile1806Ile in exon 43 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in a similar frequency in Chinese cases (5/146 (3.4%) chromosomes) and controls (8/192 (4.2%) chromosomes) (Wang 2010). In addition, this variant has been identified by our laboratory in three indivi duals; two of whom have another genetic etiology for their hearing loss. Further more, this variant does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

2.8

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over