rs117175017

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_003859.3(DPM1):​c.40C>T​(p.Arg14Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00268 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R14R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

DPM1
NM_003859.3 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.78

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DPM1 (HGNC:3005): (dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1, catalytic) Dolichol-phosphate mannose (Dol-P-Man) serves as a donor of mannosyl residues on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Lack of Dol-P-Man results in defective surface expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Dol-P-Man is synthesized from GDP-mannose and dolichol-phosphate on the cytosolic side of the ER by the enzyme dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase. Human DPM1 lacks a carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain and signal sequence and is regulated by DPM2. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ie. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
DPM1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006441295).
BP6
Variant 20-50958484-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-50958484-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 338758.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00161 (245/152236) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00246 (167/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00215. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 109 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DPM1NM_003859.3 linkc.40C>T p.Arg14Trp missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 ENST00000371588.10 NP_003850.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DPM1ENST00000371588.10 linkc.40C>T p.Arg14Trp missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 1 NM_003859.3 ENSP00000360644.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00161
AC:
245
AN:
152118
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00246
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00164
AC:
412
AN:
251296
AF XY:
0.00164
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00279
AC:
4080
AN:
1461700
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00272
AC XY:
1979
AN XY:
727162
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000299
AC:
10
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
65
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000765
AC:
2
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
132
AN:
53232
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000520
AC:
3
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00337
AC:
3750
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00192
AC:
116
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
252
503
755
1006
1258
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
164
328
492
656
820
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00161
AC:
245
AN:
152236
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
109
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000457
AC:
19
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
18
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
34
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00246
AC:
167
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.532
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
25
37
50
62
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00211
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00150
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00467
AC:
18
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00113
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00233
AC:
20
ExAC
AF:
0.00163
AC:
198
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00240
EpiControl
AF:
0.00308

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DPM1: BP4, BP5, BS1 -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The DPM1 p.Arg14Trp variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs117175017) and ClinVar (reported as likely benign by Invitae and a VUS by Illumina and GeneDx for Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E). The variant was identified in control databases in 472 of 282680 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.00167 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 71 of 24980 chromosomes (freq: 0.002842), European (non-Finnish) in 327 of 129138 chromosomes (freq: 0.002532), Other in 15 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.002076), Latino in 47 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.001326) and African in 12 of 24956 chromosomes (freq: 0.000481); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and four out of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. The p.Arg14 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Apr 21, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the DPM1 gene. The R14W variant has been previously reported in the heterozygous state in an individual with antithrombin deficiency, ventricular septal defect and scoliosis who also harbored homozygous variants in the ALG12 gene. The authors suggest a diagnosis of CDG due to the homozygous ALG12 variants identified in this individual (de la Morena-Barrio et al., 2016). The R14W variant is observed in 154/66626 (0.23%) alleles from individuals of European background (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved, and in silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.54
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.081
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0064
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L;.;.
PhyloP100
1.8
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.92
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.046
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T;D
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.54
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.075
T
GERP RS
2.4
PromoterAI
-0.16
Neutral
Varity_R
0.070
gMVP
0.69
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117175017; hg19: chr20-49575021; API