rs117175017
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_003859.3(DPM1):c.40C>T(p.Arg14Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00268 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003859.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM1 | NM_003859.3 | c.40C>T | p.Arg14Trp | missense_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000371588.10 | NP_003850.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM1 | ENST00000371588.10 | c.40C>T | p.Arg14Trp | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_003859.3 | ENSP00000360644.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00161 AC: 245AN: 152118Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00164 AC: 412AN: 251296Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00164 AC XY: 223AN XY: 135834
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00279 AC: 4080AN: 1461700Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00272 AC XY: 1979AN XY: 727162
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00161 AC: 245AN: 152236Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00146 AC XY: 109AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | DPM1: BP4, BP5, BS1 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The DPM1 p.Arg14Trp variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs117175017) and ClinVar (reported as likely benign by Invitae and a VUS by Illumina and GeneDx for Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E). The variant was identified in control databases in 472 of 282680 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.00167 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (Finnish) in 71 of 24980 chromosomes (freq: 0.002842), European (non-Finnish) in 327 of 129138 chromosomes (freq: 0.002532), Other in 15 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.002076), Latino in 47 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.001326) and African in 12 of 24956 chromosomes (freq: 0.000481); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and four out of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. The p.Arg14 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Congenital disorder of glycosylation type 1E Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 21, 2017 | A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the DPM1 gene. The R14W variant has been previously reported in the heterozygous state in an individual with antithrombin deficiency, ventricular septal defect and scoliosis who also harbored homozygous variants in the ALG12 gene. The authors suggest a diagnosis of CDG due to the homozygous ALG12 variants identified in this individual (de la Morena-Barrio et al., 2016). The R14W variant is observed in 154/66626 (0.23%) alleles from individuals of European background (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved, and in silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at